Is there a reason you can't just change your rewrite rule to a [R=301]?
Thanks,
Rick Houser
Auto-Owners Insurance
Systems Support
(517)703-2580
-Original Message-
From: Anthony J. Biacco [mailto:abia...@formatdynamics.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 4:53 PM
To:
Yeah, it would create twice the number of requests to my server. One for
the initial hit and the other for the redirect. If it was a small % of
my hits, I wouldn't care, but this url is about 90% of my web server
hits.
-Tony
---
Manager, IT Operations
Format Dynamics, Inc.
httpd issues the message
server reached MaxClients setting, consider raising the
MaxClients setting
as soon as the number of spare threads drops below MinSpareThreads. In
a pathological case where MinSpareThreads is high, the number of threads
actually in use might be nowhere near MaxClients.
Sorry, my email client mangled that patch. Trying another
one:
Index: server/mpm/worker/worker.c
===
--- server/mpm/worker/worker.c (revision 756126)
+++ server/mpm/worker/worker.c (working copy)
@@ -1509,15 +1509,27 @@
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
assert(Whatever is done in mod_ssl, the 2.3 logic in mod_authany needs to
ensure that its check user id hook runs after mod_ssl's.)
I'm going with this code in mod_authany for Apache 2.0/2.2 as soon as it
checks out okay on
torsdag 19 mars 2009 21:36:42 skrev Jeff Trawick:
[...]
I keep getting:
t/modules/include...ok 46/88# Failed test 67 in t/modules/include.t at
line 396
On Mandriva Linux (cooker)
--
Regards // Oden Eriksson
This email has been processed by SmoothZap -
2009/3/20 Oden Eriksson oden.eriks...@envitory.se
torsdag 19 mars 2009 21:36:42 skrev Jeff Trawick:
[...]
I keep getting:
t/modules/include...ok 46/88# Failed test 67 in t/modules/include.t
at
line 396
On Mandriva Linux (cooker)
AFAICT, that observation is completely
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Oden Eriksson
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. März 2009 16:53
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: test framework/mod_authany's check user id hook
vs. mod_ssl's
torsdag 19 mars 2009 21:36:42 skrev Jeff Trawick:
[...]
I keep getting:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 04:36:42PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Beyond the mod_authany question, why doesn't mod_ssl declare its check user
id hook really-first if it can generate the basic auth? (Let the extremely
limited number of modules which generate basic auth headers fight it out via
Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 04:36:42PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Beyond the mod_authany question, why doesn't mod_ssl declare its check user
id hook really-first if it can generate the basic auth? (Let the extremely
limited number of modules which generate basic auth headers
Hi guys,
Anybody come across this before?
Thanks
Ryan.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Ryan Deemer ryan.dee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am porting my custom module from apache 2.0 module to 2.2.11 using
gcc-3.4.6 and get the following warning in the usage of AP_INIT_TAKE1.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Ryan Deemer ryan.dee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Anybody come across this before?
dunno
are you sure the types of the arguments to AP_INIT_TAKEx are correct?
If you build httpd yourself, did the compilation of the bundled modules spew
the same warnings?
fredag 20 mars 2009 17:09:43 skrev Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Oden Eriksson
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. März 2009 16:53
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: test framework/mod_authany's check user id hook
vs. mod_ssl's
torsdag 19 mars 2009 21:36:42
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:02:32 -0400
Ryan Deemer ryan.dee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am porting my custom module from apache 2.0 module to 2.2.11 using
gcc-3.4.6 and get the following warning in the usage of
AP_INIT_TAKE1.
mod_reversal.c:786: warning: initialization from incompatible
Hi,
I need the include virtual directive to be able to issue POST requests.
It should pass the request body to the subrequest. So I came up with
the attached patch.
It allows to write
!--#include method=post virtual=... -- or
!--#include method=inherit virtual=... --
I think the patch is
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
I need the include virtual directive to be able to issue POST requests.
It should pass the request body to the subrequest. So I came up with
the attached patch.
It allows to write
!--#include method=post virtual=... -- or
!--#include method=inherit virtual=... --
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:17:08 +0100
Torsten Foertsch torsten.foert...@gmx.net wrote:
I need the include virtual directive to be able to issue POST
requests. It should pass the request body to the subrequest. So I
came up with the attached patch.
Did you mean to attach something?
It allows to
17 matches
Mail list logo
