On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 03:27, Richard Langly
richard.ringo.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've written an small hello world like module and compiled it as such.
sudo apxs -lcar -ci ./mod_car.c
But when I try to start it, I get the following error ...
$ /etc/init.d/apache2
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kaspar Brand
Gesendet: Montag, 30. März 2009 18:15
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: SNI in 2.2.x (Re: Time for 2.2.10?)
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Going through the archive I noticed several attachments
with the same
basename and and a
Today I stubled accross some rather weird intermittent segfaults / core dumps
with trunk
plus APR trunk that get created when running the perl test framework. Below is
the stack trace:
#0 0x002a95f7f829 in kill () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#1 signal handler called
#2 ap_ident_lookup
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote:
On 7 Apr 2009, at 00:14, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
As a matter of curiosity, why do we have two separate hooks with
identical signatures running consecutively? AFAIK it's not historic -
it goes right
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [mailto:ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. April 2009 13:29
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: segfaults / core dumps caused by ap_internal_fast_redirect
How to solve?
I don't know. This is why I write
Comments on interface or the minimal implementation details?
traditional:--with-mpm=FOO includes the FOO mpm, statically linked
temporary hack:
--with-mpm=shared avoids building/linking in an MPM
future:
traditional --with-mpm is retained;
also support --with-mpms-shared=MPM-LIST; this has to be
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:29:20PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
...
I think the reason for this behaviour is the following:
1. The subrequest created by mod_dir uses a subpool of r-pool for its
allocations.
2. ap_internal_fast_redirect uses the data allocated out of this subpool
I'm working on securing massive NameVirtualHost sites using SSL.
The SNI support should be avoided since we needed a stock Apache 2.x /
mod_ssl solution, so it prevent us to take a look at
mod_gnutls/gnutls.
Question : How hard will it be to have SNI support conditional and
activated/disabled by
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Comments on interface or the minimal implementation details?
traditional:
--with-mpm=FOO includes the FOO mpm, statically linked
temporary hack:
--with-mpm=shared avoids building/linking in an MPM
future:
traditional --with-mpm is retained;
also support
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Comments on interface or the minimal implementation details?
Externally, the selection of the default MPM should match this logic
(slight expansion on Jim's simple default=event change):
if
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. April 2009 15:51
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: segfaults / core dumps caused by
ap_internal_fast_redirect
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:29:20PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger,
VF-Group wrote:
...
I think the
hi all,
please can I know is there any technical documentation for
mod_proxy_balancer module.
Best Regards,
H. Iroshan
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
How to solve?
I don't know. This is why I write this mail :-).
We eliminate internal_fast_redirect ;-)
On 04/07/2009 02:10 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Tue Apr 7 12:10:57 2009
New Revision: 762730
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=762730view=rev
Log:
Set keep_running and clean pool if not.
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/cluster/mod_heartmonitor.c
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:01 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
How to solve?
I don't know. This is why I write this mail :-).
We eliminate internal_fast_redirect ;-)
hell yeah, I would love to eliminate internal redirects completely.
On 04/07/2009 03:38 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Tue Apr 7 13:38:01 2009
New Revision: 762771
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=762771view=rev
Log:
Arrange traces.
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/cluster/mod_heartmonitor.c
Modified:
Hello,
I've posted my idea to improve web-application security a few times
however, it could not interest folks unfortunatelly. :(
So, I would like to offer another approach for the purpose.
The attached patch is a proof of the concept of newer idea.
Any comments are welcome, and please feel
Explain first why using FASTCGI and suexec wouldn't be a better option?
It concerns me that in your plans, even though you are changing the
security context of a single thread within an existing process, that
that thread may still has access to all the process memory and so
could read or modify
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Explain first why using FASTCGI and suexec wouldn't be a better option?
Thease are limited to cgi applications, so we cannot apply such kind
of restriction on the built-in script languages and references on
static documents (like *.html).
# For example, when we want to
2009/4/8 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Explain first why using FASTCGI and suexec wouldn't be a better option?
Thease are limited to cgi applications, so we cannot apply such kind
of restriction on the built-in script languages and references on
static documents
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/4/8 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Explain first why using FASTCGI and suexec wouldn't be a better option?
Thease are limited to cgi applications, so we cannot apply such kind
of restriction on the built-in script languages and
21 matches
Mail list logo
