Location of Apache Modules

2009-04-21 Thread Michele Waldman
I ran a find for functions like ap_hook_auth_checker, ap_run_type_checker and a few other functions. I could not find the function definitions. All I could find was a reference to them in server/export.c. Does anyone know where all of the functions are? It's difficult to trace through the

FW: [M] mod_auth_digest hook

2009-04-21 Thread Michele Waldman
Maybe, if I'm a little clearer someone might be able to point in the right direction. I don't think I need to modify mod_auth_digest, but another apache module. What I have is a person login into htaccess using ajax. The file they access has htaccess require valid-user. The first time they log

RE: Location of Apache Modules

2009-04-21 Thread Michele Waldman
Did your browser send digest credentials on the ajax request? You can log %{Authorization}i in the access log to quickly tell. Yes. The browser is sending the creditials. I did check this. That's what was hanging me up. If credentials were sent, can mod_log_config log a %u or were they

Re: 2.2.12 ?

2009-04-21 Thread jean-frederic clere
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Hi, I count ~24 changes since 2.2.11 and at least 2 of which I've been asked to plop directly in freebsd ports tree. That tells me its time. I know I haven't done it before, but I might consider being the RM if everyone else is ENOTIME. Thoughts? Rainer wanted

Re: 2.2.12 ?

2009-04-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 21.04.2009 08:48, jean-frederic clere wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Hi, I count ~24 changes since 2.2.11 and at least 2 of which I've been asked to plop directly in freebsd ports tree. That tells me its time. I know I haven't done it before, but I might consider being the RM if

Re: mod_proxy/mod_proxy_balancer bug

2009-04-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 20.04.2009 15:57, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Apr 17, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: The same type of balancing decision algorithm was part of mod_jk between 1.2.7 and 1.2.15. I always had problems to understand, how it exactly behaves in case some workers are out of order. The

Re: SNI in 2.2.x (Re: Time for 2.2.10?)

2009-04-21 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 04/21/2009 07:10 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote: Ruediger Pluem wrote: Looks good. Some minor nitpicks: Furthermore I think that we need to check for CA list change in any case that we need to renegotiate as even if we do not fail on SSL level due to SSL_VERIFY_FAIL_IF_NO_PEER_CERT there