Hello.
Could someone please tell when apache 2.2.12 is expected to be released?
Thanks in advance.
This email has been processed by SmoothZap - www.smoothwall.net
Hi,
since one httpd version can link to a couple of different apr/apr-util
versions I find it useful to have these versions listed with mod_info,
and if nobody objects then I would like to apply a patch similar to the
one below (which is 2.2.x) to trunk, and then propose for backport into
2.2.x:
On 07/05/2009 04:45 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
since one httpd version can link to a couple of different apr/apr-util
versions I find it useful to have these versions listed with mod_info,
and if nobody objects then I would like to apply a patch similar to the
one below (which is 2.2.x)
Hi,
in mpm_common.h there appear now some new functions named ap_mpm_pod_*;
however I can currently find only one C implementation of these
functions in mpm_unix.c - how is it supposed to work for other mpms?
Should each mpm have an adapted copy of these functions in its own files?
Linking
Hi Rüdiger,
Ruediger Pluem schrieb:
No objections, but the above should not be part of the patch as the HTML
header stuff is already done in mod_info and would be doubled.
yes, I know; but its only in trunk - with 2.2.x branch its missing ...
Günter.
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
in mpm_common.h there appear now some new functions named ap_mpm_pod_*;
however I can currently find only one C implementation of these
functions in mpm_unix.c - how is it supposed to work for other mpms?
What other
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Trawick schrieb:
What other MPMs need them? If these are of more general use, we can
move them to mpm_common.
Is your Netware link failing because there is a reference to those
functions somewhere, even though they aren't actually used? (I don't
see where Netware uses those,
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Trawick schrieb:
What other MPMs need them? If these are of more general use, we can
move them to mpm_common.
Is your Netware link failing because there is a reference to those
functions somewhere,
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Trawick schrieb:
I think you can just move those functions, and the 2(?) static support
functions they use, to mpm_common.c. They're not Unix-specific; they
just aren't used currently by non-Unix MPMs.
This will add a little extra unused code for Windows and Netware, but
Hi Nick,
n...@apache.org schrieb:
+ -0.9: niq: Please get rid of that ghastly pseudo-HTML font crap.
+ It's only valid in transitional, which has been
+ deprecated legacy stuff since 1997.
+ Without the font I'm +1.
uhmm, I did only use what was already
10 matches
Mail list logo