Hi, all;
It is my pleasure to confirm that we have received enough votes to
PASS the release of httpd-2.4.41! As always, I thank everyone for their
diligence in testing this release and am very happy we caught the minor
regression during 2.4.40 validation cycles to prevent a potentially
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:33 PM Don Poitras wrote:
>
> Eric,
> I'm not sure what you're asking. The global mutex will cover the call to
> init_conn_pool(), so there isn't a problem with worker->cp getting overlayed
> if that's what you're thinking.
I am thinking the opposite. Two threads
Eric,
I'm not sure what you're asking. The global mutex will cover the call to
init_conn_pool(), so there isn't a problem with worker->cp getting overlayed if
that's what you're thinking. The problem is that ap_proxy_initialize_worker()
gets called repeatedly with the same worker pointer. The
Via inspection this looks quite sane.
> On Aug 12, 2019, at 3:24 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> Hi Don, can you try this very similar patch? I applied yours to my
> sandbox to get more context and made a few minor changes (including
> pre-existing stuff that looked misleading)
>
>
Hi Don, can you try this very similar patch? I applied yours to my
sandbox to get more context and made a few minor changes (including
pre-existing stuff that looked misleading)
http://people.apache.org/~covener/trunk-proxy-segv.diff
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:43 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:37 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:32 PM Don Poitras wrote:
> >
> > Eric,
> > The global mutex only serializes concurrent calls to
> > ap_proxy_initialize_worker(). The worker pool is also used when the
> > proxy_handler() is called from a
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:32 PM Don Poitras wrote:
>
> Eric,
> The global mutex only serializes concurrent calls to
> ap_proxy_initialize_worker(). The worker pool is also used when the
> proxy_handler() is called from a thread kicked off from a _previous_ call to
>
Am 09.08.2019 um 15:40 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.41:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's
Eric,
The global mutex only serializes concurrent calls to
ap_proxy_initialize_worker(). The worker pool is also used when the
proxy_handler() is called from a thread kicked off from a _previous_ call to
ap_proxy_initialize_worker() . Turning on the pool concurrency check shows this
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 08:40:38AM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball as 2.4.41:
>
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 11:58:44AM +0200, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would appreciate some other eyes on the patch below.
> I guess that that the fix is correct, but I don't know the possible
> implication of the fix.
>
> As said in the commit description, -1 seems to be
11 matches
Mail list logo
