On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:05 PM Joe Orton wrote:
>
> For 2.4.x I would argue it's better to keep a preference for 8.x over
> 10.x so that users aren't switched from one to the other across an
> upgrade - with some new performance trade-off we know about - without
> changing the
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:26 PM Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
>
> Le 17/01/2022 à 13:27, Ruediger Pluem a écrit :
> >
> > With regards to the de-optimization / stack usage probably stupid question:
> > Can't we use the TLS features that several compilers offer?
> > e.g. see at the end of the page at
Le 17/01/2022 à 13:27, Ruediger Pluem a écrit :
On 1/16/22 10:35 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
4 day ago, you all saw this. 6 years ago, you all started using this on trunk.
Don't know what I can to do help this along and honor the library
author's wishes for
all of us to walk away from the
On 17 Jan 2022, at 19:17, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> I see. Thanks for the clarification. Did not really now about that
>> interface. Then I see no pressing point in adding an additional API, indeed.
>
> I haven't looked deeply in this, but based on the pointers from Joe I guess
> this can be
Le 17/01/2022 à 14:16, Ruediger Pluem a écrit :
On 1/17/22 1:38 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 7:28 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 1/16/22 10:35 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
4 day ago, you all saw this. 6 years ago, you all started using this on trunk.
Don't know what I
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022, 09:37 Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 1/17/22 4:05 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 03:35:15PM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> >> 4 day ago, you all saw this. 6 years ago, you all started using this on
> trunk.
> >>
> >> Don't know what I can to do help
Ixney on the alloca. That's the entire point of not moving array
allocations to the stack, because the author won't take responsibility for
potential underflows and overflows. Stack is the wrong place for these bits
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022, 06:38 Eric Covener wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at
On 1/17/22 5:32 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
>
>> Am 17.01.2022 um 16:42 schrieb Joe Orton :
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 03:37:05PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>>> My current, rough idea would be:
>>>
>>> - fork a process, like mod_cgid does, that can be communicated
>>> with over a unix
> Am 17.01.2022 um 16:42 schrieb Joe Orton :
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 03:37:05PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> My current, rough idea would be:
>>
>> - fork a process, like mod_cgid does, that can be communicated
>> with over a unix domain socket
>> - have an ap_hook to load a key and
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 03:37:05PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> My current, rough idea would be:
>
> - fork a process, like mod_cgid does, that can be communicated
> with over a unix domain socket
> - have an ap_hook to load a key and return an opaque key handle
> - have an ap_hooks to
On 1/17/22 4:05 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 03:35:15PM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>> 4 day ago, you all saw this. 6 years ago, you all started using this on
>> trunk.
>>
>> Don't know what I can to do help this along and honor the library
>> author's wishes for all of
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 03:35:15PM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> 4 day ago, you all saw this. 6 years ago, you all started using this on trunk.
>
> Don't know what I can to do help this along and honor the library
> author's wishes for all of us to walk away from the dead fork, and use
>
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 02:16:32PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 1/17/22 1:38 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 7:28 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/16/22 10:35 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> >>> 4 day ago, you all saw this. 6 years ago, you all
On 1/17/22 1:38 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 7:28 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/16/22 10:35 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>>> 4 day ago, you all saw this. 6 years ago, you all started using this on
>>> trunk.
>>>
>>> Don't know what I can to do help this along
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 7:28 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/16/22 10:35 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> > 4 day ago, you all saw this. 6 years ago, you all started using this on
> > trunk.
> >
> > Don't know what I can to do help this along and honor the library
> > author's wishes for
> >
On 1/16/22 10:35 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> 4 day ago, you all saw this. 6 years ago, you all started using this on trunk.
>
> Don't know what I can to do help this along and honor the library
> author's wishes for
> all of us to walk away from the dead fork, and use the maintained
> fork.
16 matches
Mail list logo
