On 3/3/22 5:40 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 05:11:52PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> On 3/3/22 4:49 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
>>> Folks (in no way pointing a finger at Jim who just did merging duty), it
>>> is not hard to test your backport proposals, either in an SVN branch or
On 3/3/22 6:47 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Do we have a users guide for this specific implementation and setup? TIA!
Have a look here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/test/README.travis?view=markup
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/dev-tools/github/README?view=markup
Regards
Do we have a users guide for this specific implementation and setup? TIA!
Cheers
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 05:11:52PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 3/3/22 4:49 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > Folks (in no way pointing a finger at Jim who just did merging duty), it
> > is not hard to test your backport proposals, either in an SVN branch or
> > a github PR if you want better
Hi Jim,
I read Linus' statements on it and it really had to do with a technical
use case that I think this article spells out well:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/linus-torvalds-prepares-to-move-the-linux-kernel-to-modern-c/
I think we need something similar. What is the reason for this
On 3/3/22 4:49 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 01:30:47PM -, j...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jim
>> Date: Thu Mar 3 13:30:46 2022
>> New Revision: 1898566
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1898566=rev
>> Log:
>> dbm backport approved and merged
>
> This has
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 01:30:47PM -, j...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Thu Mar 3 13:30:46 2022
> New Revision: 1898566
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1898566=rev
> Log:
> dbm backport approved and merged
This has broken the CI with several new warnings and empty
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 8:54 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I'm guessing we all heard the news that Linux is switching
> to c99 from c89.
>
> Time for us to consider it as well?
I thought they were skipping over c99 and going to c11.
I think httpd has an extra wrinkle with legacy OS and compiler
I'm guessing we all heard the news that Linux is switching
to c99 from c89.
Time for us to consider it as well?
> Am 03.03.2022 um 14:32 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> All three promoted. I went ahead and merged the 'dbm' patch
Thanks, Jim!
>
>> On Mar 3, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>>
>> There are some important fixes pending release. Work does not appear to
>> slow down in the
All three promoted. I went ahead and merged the 'dbm' patch
> On Mar 3, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> There are some important fixes pending release. Work does not appear to
> slow down in the foreseeable future, so I'd like us to make them available.
>
> Looking at 2.4.x STATUS,
There are some important fixes pending release. Work does not appear to
slow down in the foreseeable future, so I'd like us to make them available.
Looking at 2.4.x STATUS, there are 3 backport proposals lacking 1 vote:
- dbm: Split the loading of a dbm driver
- mod_proxy: Bump shared worker name
12 matches
Mail list logo
