On 3/6/23 6:46 PM, di...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: dirkx
> Date: Mon Mar 6 17:46:04 2023
> New Revision: 1908132
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908132=rev
> Log:
> Add SSL_SHARED_CIPHER environment variable
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
>
+1 All looks fine on Windows.
> Op 5 mrt. 2023 om 22:32 heeft Eric Covener het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to
[resent to dev@]
On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 01:40:39PM -, ic...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: icing
> Date: Sat Mar 4 13:40:38 2023
> New Revision: 1908060
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908060=rev
> Log:
> Test case updates related to macOS ventura changes:
>
> - python 3.11
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 04:31:34PM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as 2.4.56:
[x] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
+1
> On 6 Mar 2023, at 13:32, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/6/23 12:35 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>> I was cleaning up some of our private code - and came across the patch below
>> - exposing the SHARED_CHIPHERs.
>>
>> We scratch this itch in a few places to help force (or
On 3/6/23 12:35 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> I was cleaning up some of our private code - and came across the patch below
> - exposing the SHARED_CHIPHERs.
>
> We scratch this itch in a few places to help force (or prevent) the forcing
> of a protocol upgrade from application land.
>
I was cleaning up some of our private code - and came across the patch below -
exposing the SHARED_CHIPHERs.
We scratch this itch in a few places to help force (or prevent) the forcing of
a protocol upgrade from application land.
No idea how common that is - any reason not to submit this as a
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 10:31 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as 2.4.56:
+1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
All checksums/sigs and tests pass (Debian 11 & 12), thanks Eric for RMing.
> Am 06.03.2023 um 10:37 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 10:28 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. Should we roll a new rc with this being backported and included?
>
> I don't think so, the ci failure is caused by an explicit script/check
> but the build works fine while
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 10:28 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> Thanks. Should we roll a new rc with this being backported and included?
I don't think so, the ci failure is caused by an explicit script/check
but the build works fine while runtime will only log an empty "AH"
number, not a show stopper
On 3/6/23 10:24 AM, jor...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jorton
> Date: Mon Mar 6 09:24:44 2023
> New Revision: 1908116
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908116=rev
> Log:
> * modules/http2/mod_proxy_http2.c: Fix missing APLOGNO.
>
> Modified:
>
On 3/2/23 4:46 PM, m...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: manu
> Date: Thu Mar 2 15:46:12 2023
> New Revision: 1907984
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1907984=rev
> Log:
> Add RFC4331 quotas for mod_dav_fs
>
> Address forgotten svn add in previous commit
>
> Added:
>
On 3/5/23 22:31, Eric Covener wrote:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as 2.4.56:
[ ] +1: It's not just
14 matches
Mail list logo
