On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 03:06:09PM -0800, Garrett Rooney wrote:
First of all, mod_proxy_balancer really assumes that you can make
multiple connections to back end fastcgi processes at once. This may
be true for some things that speak fastcgi (python programs that use
flup to do it sure look
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:08:19AM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
Hmmm... the docs explain both a soft limit and a maximum limit, but
doesn't describe the difference between the two.
The soft/hard limits are a notion held in the underlying
ulimit/setrlimit facility.
Unrpivileged users can
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:16:53PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Directory /www/mydocs
Authname ...
AuthBasicProvider ...
...
Require user John
RequireAll
Require Group admins
Require ldap-group cn=mygroup,o=foo
RequireOne
Require ldap-attribute
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:52:44PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Yeah, maybe it's time to re-open this discussion... previously,
whenever we thought about adding more functionality to
the config file, it was discouraged because it increases the
complexity of Apache for something that could more
To add my 12 cents, I would like to see the following. (Note that I am
speaking from a mainly Apache 1.3 viewpoint; I'm pretty sure the following
didn't exist in 2.0 when I looked, but I've not checked whether any of these
have made it into 2.2 already)
1. In mod_cgi, an option for the stderr
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 02:58:00PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
fork() is *painfully* slow on the darwin kernel, I haven't tested but can't
imagine that threading isn't a huge win here.
Explain?
One preforked worker process can handle thousands of requests. Apache
doesn't have to fork
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 04:02:49AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm referring to shrinking or growing the pool of threads/processes as
needed.
If worker grows threads as needed, or even has to spawn only one more
process
to create dozens of threads, this is goodness.
But is it a
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:56:23AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Speaking of authz rewrite, currently the directives 'authtype',
'authname' and 'require' are all implemented in the core module. This
just doesn't seem like the right place for them so I am considering
moving the directives to
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:46:18PM +, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 12:02, Brian Candler wrote:
[twice - please don't]
Not sure what you mean by that. I probably did a group reply, so you got one
copy directly and one via the list. I'm afraid it's impossible to please
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:45:25PM +0100, Christophe Jaillet wrote:
If the idea sounds interesting to you, I can provide a set of patchs that
implement this idea.
Perhaps it would be better to start with profiling data. If you can
demonstrate via profiling that httpd spends a significant
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 03:49:10PM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
If httpd writes a complete line, to any kind of a file descriptor,
anything beyond that is out of our control and becomes a question of the
quality of the piped logger, filesystem or whatever else is on the
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:12:14PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Brian Candler wrote:
Hmm. Given the example
pid = (pid_t)((long)apr_hash_get(script_hash, cgid_req.conn_id,
sizeof(cgid_req.conn_id)));
then it's no good declaring variable 'pid' to be of type apr_intptr_t rather
in a CGI environment. However I can live
without that, given that it can be simulated using a regular expression as
shown above.
Regards,
Brian Candler.
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:49:07PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
RewriteRule ^/common-cgi/php_wrapper http://foo.com%{REQUEST_URI} [P]
Have you tried
RewriteRule ^/common-cgi/php_wrapper
http://foo.com%{REQUEST_URI}?%{QUERY_STRING} [P]
instead?
No, because it wouldn't do what I
I wondered if any consideration had been given to making ServerRoot an
option which could be overridden per virtual-server (e.g. as a member of
struct server_rec)?
The particular issue I have is with mass virtual hosting and directives like
AuthUserFile in .htaccess files. If you have
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 08:58:55AM -0700, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
After struggling for hours - and not 'getting' why my ssl authentication
broke :-) would something like the patch below be of use ?
All this does is to check if the kernel has support for
httpready/dataready filtering.
whether this
is The Right Way[TM] to deal with this problem, but it's certainly made a
huge improvement here. Comments gratefully received.
If this is the right approach, perhaps one of the main Apache developers
would like to produce a tidier patch?
Regards,
Brian Candler.
--- apache_1.3.27/src/main
17 matches
Mail list logo
