Luc Pardon said:
In that case the 2.0 httpd.spec files should either a) not require
pre-installed apr packages and build apr as part of the httpd rpm,
A definite -1 on this. If this were so, httpd could not coexist cleanly
with other packages that depended on APR.
or b)
build the
Graham Leggett wrote:
Luc Pardon said:
In that case the 2.0 httpd.spec files should either a) not require
pre-installed apr packages and build apr as part of the httpd rpm,
A definite -1 on this. If this were so, httpd could not coexist cleanly
with other packages that depended
Luc Pardon said:
Yes, but what got me confused is that the httpd tarball comes with
the APR source (hence the docs don't talk about it as being a
prerequisite) whereas the current spec file requires you to go elsewhere
and get something that is already there. It seem to me that this kind
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
snip
This was a snafu in the way the rpm change was presented, not in the
tarballs. httpd-2.0's distribution tarball will always contain apr 0.9.
That doesn't mean httpd-2.2 (with apr 1.x) will do the same; that's yet
to be determined.
In that case the
