Hi Sander,
I tried yesterday evening a build from the tarball, and NetWare Makefiles seem
somehow broken for me. I have just fetched the tarballs from
http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/ and get the same result: 2.0.x-dev breaks with
the extfilter module, while 2.1.x-dev works fine
Can you
Guenter,
I just pulled and built the 2.0.54 tarball again and I am not seeing any
problems. mod_extfilter is building without any errors or warnings. I think
that Sander can go ahead with the release and if something unexpected pops up
in the NetWare build, we will post a patch.
Brad
Hi Brad,
I just pulled and built the 2.0.54 tarball again and I am not seeing
any problems. mod_extfilter is building without any errors or
warnings. I think that Sander can go ahead with the release and if
something unexpected pops up in the NetWare build, we will post a
At 01:28 PM 4/14/2005, Sander Striker wrote:
Bill, do you happen to have time to get some win32 balls up on dev/dist
so I can push it out together with the other tarballs?
As soon as I get back this evening.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:09:38PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please one request; be as specific as you can about OS flavor and
kernel, these things help us to grok exactly how widely the current
build is being tested.
FYI, on FreeBSD, port of release candidates are available for
On Thursday 14 April 2005 5:09 am, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:24 PM 4/13/2005, Christian Parpart wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 9:25 am, Sander Striker wrote:
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
not that I'm an apache dev - within the ASF. But I've
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
Given the reponses and the fact that it has been hosting most
of our own webtraffic for a bit I conclude it is looking good for
release.
On Apr 12, 2005, at 12:25 AM, Sander Striker wrote:
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
I ran on Darwin 7.8.0, FreeBSD 4.10 and Red Hat 8.0. Threw PHP 5.0.4
into the mix for amusement and to get a bunch of extra tests running. I
then ran against 2.0.53 for
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 9:25 am, Sander Striker wrote:
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
not that I'm an apache dev - within the ASF. But I've installed it locally and
on 2 of three prod.
--On Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:25 AM +0200 Sander Striker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
+1.
Passes httpd-test on Darwin with the unexpected success on include
Compiled fine on a Linux 2.4 machine, including mod-deflate, a
particular fave of mine.
Not that my vote counts, but:
+1
smp
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a
At 01:24 PM 4/13/2005, Christian Parpart wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 9:25 am, Sander Striker wrote:
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
not that I'm an apache dev - within the ASF. But I've installed it locally and
on 2 of three prod. hosts. One with having
Hi,
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
Thanks,
Sander
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:25:22AM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
+1 for release, looks good in httpd-test'ing here. Thanks for RMing.
joe
tisdag 12 april 2005 09.25 skrev Sander Striker:
Hi,
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
Works for me.
+1
--
Regards // Oden Eriksson
Mandriva: http://www.mandriva.com
NUX: http://nux.se
At 02:25 AM 4/12/2005, Sander Striker wrote:
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
Hmmm. How does the current infrastructure state of http://*.apache.org
fit into testing this live for our site?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 02:25 AM 4/12/2005, Sander Striker wrote:
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
Hmmm. How does the current infrastructure state of http://*.apache.org
fit into testing
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 02:25 AM 4/12/2005, Sander Striker wrote:
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
Hmmm. How does the current infrastructure state of http://*.apache.org
fit into testing
At 09:16 AM 4/12/2005, Bill Stoddard wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Hmmm. How does the current infrastructure state of http://*.apache.org
fit into testing this live for our site? Is it possible to subject
ourselves to the usual three days of our own dogfood?
+1
I ask because - with some
19 matches
Mail list logo
