Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
since one httpd version can link to a couple of different apr/apr-util
versions I find it useful to have these versions listed with mod_info,
and if nobody objects then I would like to apply a patch similar to the
one below (which is 2.2.x) to trunk, and then propose
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
since one httpd version can link to a couple of different apr/apr-util
versions I find it useful to have these versions listed with mod_info,
and if nobody objects then I would like to apply a patch similar to the
one below (which is
Hi,
since one httpd version can link to a couple of different apr/apr-util
versions I find it useful to have these versions listed with mod_info,
and if nobody objects then I would like to apply a patch similar to the
one below (which is 2.2.x) to trunk, and then propose for backport into
2.2.x:
On 07/05/2009 04:45 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
since one httpd version can link to a couple of different apr/apr-util
versions I find it useful to have these versions listed with mod_info,
and if nobody objects then I would like to apply a patch similar to the
one below (which is 2.2.x)
Hi Rüdiger,
Ruediger Pluem schrieb:
No objections, but the above should not be part of the patch as the HTML
header stuff is already done in mod_info and would be doubled.
yes, I know; but its only in trunk - with 2.2.x branch its missing ...
Günter.
