I don´t know if I really understood what you mean.
If you are just talking about the iBates part of code, to give a more examples,
it is okay.
But if you are talking about the whole application this can be a nightmare!!!
Please, explain better your idea.
Woody
- Original Message -
I mean deploying your .java files to production alongside your .class files
and having it available on the classpath at runtime.
com/yourdomain/yourapp/SomeClass.java
com/yourdomain/yourapp/SomeClass.class
I hope thats more clear.
Clinton
From: agodinhost [mailto:[EMAIL
I used to do that, but looking at it now, I am asking What's the cost
and what's the value?.
The cost in terms of disk is negligible these days - You can't buy a
drive 120GB these days, so what's a few hundred KB, or even a few MB
on disk? Especially compared to the 80MB of struts or spring?
I'm
You've caught me...and you're the perfect person to have done so. I am
indeed thinking of enhanced runtime reflection. See if Java reflection was
complete, this wouldn't even be a discussion. Certainly in C# land it is
not.
There's two reasons: 1) parameter names as you've guessed, 2)
I think there would be a couple issues...
The first is overcoming the stigma of deploying src alongside your compiled
code. The knee jerk reaction is going to be about security. However, what is
humorous about that is that companies regularly expose their database
structures via SQL in xml files
Agree - no security risk, no real downside except cultural. BTW - we used
to do this as an elementary form of source control. Crude but effective.
I'm interested - if you're looking to improve reflection, have you found a
good parser? The Eclipse parser is excellent, but hard to break out as a
Definitely not a security risk...decompilers, decompilers, decompilers...
:-)
But, now its time to play the card Ive been holding back.
Every day, thousands of developers (of well over 50% of web apps) deploy
their source code to their web/app servers in the form of PHP, Perl, Python
and
I dont think we need a parser. I could pull that out with regex. No need
to go further than we have to with it.
This is all very high level anyway...I wouldnt plan on adding this as a
release feature or anything. Its just a thought.
Cheers,
Clinton
From: Jeff Butler
