Hi there,
sorry for not beeing more active etc. ;-). I want to go for a iBATIS 2.3.5
release (maybe the last 2.3.x
one?). I'm currently cleaning up jira so everything there is correct and would
then stick to
http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/IBATIS/iBATIS+Release+Process
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12741498#action_12741498
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-615:
---
have you by any chance by affected by IBATIS
in order to keep the jira clean I've created a Beta 1 and a GA version there.
If we need further Beta versions
until a GA we can add such versions accordingly...
cheers
Kai
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: Clinton Begin
Datum: 06.08.2009 17:21
Hi everybody... sorry for the delay in
sorry for not beeing much active lately, I'm buried in work.
But +1, thats for sure ;-)
cheers
Kai
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: Clinton Begin
Datum: 04.08.2009 19:32
Yes,
In fact, I really owe Jeff a lot of thanks, as he put in a lot of time
submitting unit tests and fixing bugs.
I would say we should keep them and make it clear in the documentation and the
dtd that in most cases inline
parameters maps are the better choice...
Kai
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: Jeff Butler
Datum: 03.06.2009 15:18
You can do this with inline parameter maps now in iBATIS2:
Clinton added Annotation support to iBATIS 3 but it was dropped due to a
problem with circular references
between resultmaps. Unfortunately we found no solution for that so I guess
using JPA instead of iBATIS
annotations doesn't help as well.
Regards
Kai
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12717021#action_12717021
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-568:
---
could you add a patch and testcase against
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12710456#action_12710456
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-595:
---
@Stefan: could it be that you forgot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709510#action_12709510
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-464:
---
what do you mean oyu get similar error
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12708532#action_12708532
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-483:
---
I can't reproduce this within a unit test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kai Grabfelder closed IBATIS-597.
-
Resolution: Invalid
please ask questions like this on the user mailing list. The answer to your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12704926#action_12704926
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-594:
---
so value objects implementing the new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12704966#action_12704966
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-585:
---
feel free to create and attache a patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12704967#action_12704967
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-483:
---
could you please post a stacktrace so
Please create a jira issue including a patch against the current ibatis trunk.
We'll then have a look into it.
cheers
Kai
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: Mark Miller
Datum: 27.04.2009 08:48
Hello there,
I was wondering if it would be possible to add object post processing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12700236#action_12700236
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-466:
---
here is what I would do:
- make sure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12695869#action_12695869
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-591:
---
can you reproduce this with ibatis 2.3.4
Hi,
please post questions like this on the user-java list. This list is for
discussing the development of iBATIS
itself.
Please also have a look at the iBATIS documentation. It is pretty good and will
answer your questions in no time.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12693543#action_12693543
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-567:
---
feel free to provide a patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12693547#action_12693547
]
Kai Grabfelder edited comment on IBATIS-580 at 3/29/09 5:12 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12693549#action_12693549
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-532:
---
unfortunately it's not just adding all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12693551#action_12693551
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-532:
---
other developers: should we switch the build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12684015#action_12684015
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-508:
---
wow it sounds like it would be very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12675305#action_12675305
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-582:
---
I guess 2.3.4 is affected as well? Fell free
: Documentation
Affects Versions: 2.3.3, 2.3.2, 2.3.1
Reporter: Kai Grabfelder
The pdf version of the developers guide in subversion is outdated. Please
export the open office file as pdf and upload it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12654860#action_12654860
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-558:
---
could you please check if this happens
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12643294#action_12643294
]
kaig edited comment on IBATIS-544 at 10/28/08 11:26 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12636605#action_12636605
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-540:
---
doesn't this has a performance impact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12636636#action_12636636
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-540:
---
cool, then I guess it is save to apply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12635452#action_12635452
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-538:
---
could you please check if you do have
Hi there,
is there anything that speak against promoting 2.3.4 (or possibly at least
2.3.3) as GA? 2.3.4 is already in
the maven repos.
Regards
Kai
wrong?
B
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Kai Grabfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi there,
is there anything that speak against promoting 2.3.4 (or possibly at
least 2.3.3) as GA? 2.3.4 is already in
the maven repos.
Regards
Kai
I think only PMC vote count but I vote +1 as well
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: Tom Duffey
Datum: 18.09.2008 22:12
Not sure if my vote counts but...
+7
On Sep 18, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Brandon Goodin wrote:
This is a vote to promote iBATIS 2.3.4 to General Availability.
Brandon
Hi Clinton,
I could also trigger the upload to iblio, but I think they only accept uploads by project members. Btw.
shouldn't 2.3.3 be flagged final once it is uploaded to the maven repo?
Regards
Kai
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: Clinton Begin
Datum: 04.09.2008 16:19
I've asked one
@Brandon: thanks: Could you also deploy a -sources.jar? I really like when projects are including this as it
makes live so much easier...
Regards
Kai
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: Clinton Begin
Datum: 09.09.2008 16:45
WAIT!!
Guys, I'll need to make a 2.3.4 build remember the
does exist, but is intended for unit testing only.
Cheers,
Clinton
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Kai Grabfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I've just found out that iBATIS try is already present in SVN - cool ;-).
Unfortunately it is not not compile-time compatible with java 6. I could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12628980#action_12628980
]
kaig edited comment on IBATIS-519 at 9/7/08 10:31 AM:
Added
Hi there,
AutoResultMap is not threadsafe if remapResults=true (thus only statements without an explicit resultMap
mapping are affected). https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-519 shows the issue. It can be easily
reproduced by using the attached maven project [1] (mvn install shows the
Hi there,
I've just found out that iBATIS try is already present in SVN - cool ;-). Unfortunately it is not not
compile-time compatible with java 6. I could write a patch for this but iBATIS 3 is not yet present in JIRA.
Could someone add a 3.0.0 version to JIRA?
Many thanks
Kai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12628339#action_12628339
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-535:
---
ok, the configuration looks ok to me. Still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12628212#action_12628212
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-535:
---
This does not necessarily mean that iBATIS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12628212#action_12628212
]
kaig edited comment on IBATIS-535 at 9/3/08 5:21 PM:
---
This
besides the discussion about the structure of the xml I have one wish: Could you describe the xml with an xml
schema instead of a dtd? It's just more accurate to describe complex xmls with a schema instead of dtd.
Regards
Kai
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: Clinton Begin
Datum:
Hi,
although it is possible to do this with maven I would rather like to see that the maven defaults are used -
just because they are some kind of convention - and convention over configuration is one of the key features
of maven. Anyway - I guess it is not a big deal to reuse the source
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12612204#action_12612204
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-515:
---
is there anything speaking against putting
Hi there,
I was wondering about the status of the two above mentioned issues. 511 is very easy to fix and the attached
patch includes a testcase. 515 would be really helpful because some xml-Editors (including eclipse) are able
to display the comments for DTD elements when editing xml files.
Hi there,
the students project is now finished. The results can be found here
http://sourceforge.net/projects/eclibatis
Installation instructions, a little bit of usage and feature documentation as well as an eclipse updatesite
will follow in the next few days...
The code is already under
Please post questions like this on the users mailing list. But to answer your question: yes you can. But you
should rather use multi line comments /* */
Regards
Kai
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: 吉崎太清
Datum: 05.07.2008 12:55
Hi,
You can write comment-out code-description or code
wow, the IntelliJ looks really great, congratulations!
cheers
Kai
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: Jacky Chan
Datum: 23.04.2008 03:23
Hi Patrick,
I have created a plugin for IntelliJ IDEA, and the user guide is
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dc73pj2h_6db54mm I know seldom about
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: 2.3.2
Reporter: Kai Grabfelder
The documentation is not present in tye .zip file...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
wanted to ask
if this could be mentioned in
the release notes for 2.3.1
Best Regards
Kai Grabfelder
Issue Type: Bug
Components: SQL Maps
Affects Versions: 2.3.1
Environment: ibatis-2.3.1.710
Reporter: Kai Grabfelder
Assume the following class com.foo.bar.Bean with the following methods:
void setFoo(int)
void setFoo(String)
int getFoo()
I'm using this bean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472268
]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-122:
---
any news on this issue? Maven is getting more and more important, any
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-368?page=comments#action_12451010 ]
Kai Grabfelder commented on IBATIS-368:
---
Of course you are right - a second interface should be used... I'm wondering
why this feature is not implemented
for Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.1.7
Reporter: Kai Grabfelder
The current RowHandler interface lacks the possibility to end current resultSet
processing. Example:
If a join query which joins categories and products Per category multiple
products
55 matches
Mail list logo