that was exactly what I wanted to achieve: let some PMC member start a vote about releasing 2.3.4 as GA and
updating the downloads page accordingly if the vote is successful. So could some PMC member start a vote?
Regards
Kai
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: Clinton Begin
Datum: 18.09.2008 17:37
2.3.4 was a bit of an emergency fix, so the vote was indeed deferred for the
GA stamp.
I think we should proceed exactly as you suggest, vote for GA anytime.
Clinton
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Also, here is our policy:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/IBATIS/iBATIS+Release+Process
Did we vote on 3.4? If not, we should probably do that so that we can
consider it GA.
B
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
The way i see it, if we consider something stable we push it out as GA. If
for some reason it fails to uphold to the quality standards of GA we can
always downgrade it to beta, fix it, and push it out a new release as GA.
The whole GA thing has more to do with terminology than anything. So as far
as I'm concerned GA is implicit when we release something. Am I wrong?
B
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Kai Grabfelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Hi there,
is there anything that speak against promoting 2.3.4 (or possibly at
least 2.3.3) as GA? 2.3.4 is already in
the maven repos.
Regards
Kai
