Re: [Discuss][Rust] Marking and closing stale issues

+1. I think stale PR actions could remind authors and reviewers of PRs they might have forgotten. On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 1:09 PM Micah Kornfield wrote: > >Should we also consider adding a github action to close stale prs? > > I think other languages deferred on stale PRs but we can maybe see ho

Re: [Discuss][Rust] Marking and closing stale issues

>Should we also consider adding a github action to close stale prs? I think other languages deferred on stale PRs but we can maybe see how the stale issues go and to the same for stale PRs it if works well? On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 11:01 PM Renjie Liu wrote: > +1 for adding this. Should we also c

Re: Discussion: Consistent exception handling for missing metadata files (NoSuchTable vs. NotFound)

Hi Ashok, thanks for the proposal. Today the client implicitly maps NotFoundException to NoSuchTableException. I agree we should preserve the distinction on the client side so callers of these clients can handle these cases differently. Yufei On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 8:22 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > N

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.10.0 RC5

+1 (non-binding) Verified signatures and checksums, RAT checks and build locally with JDK17 On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 2:33 PM Drew wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > verified signature and checksums > verified RAT license check > verified build/tests passing > ran some manual tests with GlueCatalog >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.10.0rc3

+1 (binding) - Verified signature/checksum/license - Ran install and make test-coverage in python3.11 Best regards, Honah (Jonas) On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 3:30 PM Kevin Liu wrote: > Bump, we need 1 more binding vote :) > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 9:20 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > >> +1 (binding)

Re: [DISCUSS] Donation of Dremio Auth Manager to the Apache Iceberg project

Agreed that we should discuss how to get this in. What about at tomorrow's catalog sync? On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 8:37 AM Russell Spitzer wrote: > I'm also really strongly in favor of getting these capabilities into the > project as well! I think mainly I'm > also waiting to see the design for how

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.10.0rc3

Bump, we need 1 more binding vote :) On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 9:20 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > Op vr 5 sep 2025 om 08:30 schreef Drew : > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> - verified signature and checksum >> - verified RAT license check >> - ran install, tests,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.10.0 RC5

+1 (non-binding) Verified signature, checksum and ran some tests. Thanks Steven for driving the release! Huaxin On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 8:07 AM Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 (Binding) >Verified sigs/checksums >Verified Rat > Ran full Build and test > Bothered Aihua to run the intern

Re: [DISCUSS] Donation of Dremio Auth Manager to the Apache Iceberg project

Forgot the Links: [1] https://docs.databricks.com/aws/en/external-access/admin#grant-a-principal-unity-catalog-privileges [2] https://docs.databricks.com/aws/en/dev-tools/auth/#databricks-authorization-methods [3] https://docs.snowflake.com/en/user-guide/opencatalog/query-table-using-third-party-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.10.0 RC5

+1 (binding) Verified sigs/checksums. Ran build/test. Performed the following additional manual tests: 1.) different read/write combinations with spark3.5 + Spark 4, verifying row lineage and DV behavior. 2.) Did some manual testing of maintenance procedures like snapshot expiration and compaction

Re: [DISCUSS] Donation of Dremio Auth Manager to the Apache Iceberg project

Thanks for the detailed analysis of IRC auth from the users' perspective, Christian! Limiting the scope of the initial U2M support to just the Device Code flow (in addition to Token Exchange) sounds like a reasonable approach to me. Cheers, Dmitri. On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 8:13 AM Christian Thiel

Re: Discussion: Consistent exception handling for missing metadata files (NoSuchTable vs. NotFound)

NoSuchTableException is the correct exception to use when a table is not in the catalog. NotFoundException is intended for cases where an expected file is missing (see the description

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.10.0 RC5

+1 (Binding) Verified sigs/checksums Verified Rat Ran full Build and test Bothered Aihua to run the internal SF suite :) On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 4:33 PM Drew wrote: > +1 (non binding) > >- verified signature and checksums >- verified RAT license check >- verified build/te

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.10.0 RC5

+1 (non-binding) Verified signature, checksum and run unit tests. All look good. Thanks Steven! Gang On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 4:23 PM Péter Váry wrote: > > +1 binding > > Verified the build and signatures. > Run some tests > > Everything seems fine. > > Thanks Steven! > > Kevin Liu ezt írta (id

Discussion: Consistent exception handling for missing metadata files (NoSuchTable vs. NotFound)

Hi Team, I would like to bring up an issue I've identified regarding exception handling in the Iceberg REST Catalog. Currently, if a table exists but its metadata file is missing, the *Iceberg REST Catalog* returns a *NoSuchTableException*. I believe this behavior is inconsistent with other catalo

Re: [DISCUSS] Donation of Dremio Auth Manager to the Apache Iceberg project

Dear all, Thanks for pushing this topic forward. Regarding @Dan’s first question on which flows to include: I am in favor of removing ROPC to keep the initial contribution streamlined. Similarly, I suggest we focus on a single Human-to-Machine (U2M) flow for now—preferably Device Code Flow - in ad

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.10.0 RC5

+1 binding Verified the build and signatures. Run some tests Everything seems fine. Thanks Steven! Kevin Liu ezt írta (időpont: 2025. szept. 9., K, 6:42): > +1 (non-binding) > > - Verified signature, checksum, license. > - Build + test passed using Java 21 (openjdk 21.0.7 2025-04-15 LTS) > -

Re: [DISCUSS] FileFormat API proposal

Hi Renjie, Thanks for taking a look! Let me clarify a few points: - The converter API is only required for writing position delete files for V2 tables - Currently, there are no plans to support vectorized writing via the java API - Even if we decide to support vectorized writes, I don't think we w