Re: [DISCUSS] Merging specification clarifications

OK, I started a vote thread for the PRs. Thanks, Micah On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 12:44 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > Hey Micah, > > Thanks for raising this. I was going over all the open PRs on the table > spec, and I think it would be great to get these in since they provide some > valuable clari

Re: [DISCUSS] Merging specification clarifications

Hey Micah, Thanks for raising this. I was going over all the open PRs on the table spec, and I think it would be great to get these in since they provide some valuable clarification. I think a VOTE is the most straightforward way to get it in, you can find an example here

Re: [DISCUSS] Merging specification clarifications

Hi Micah We agreed that any change to spec is considered as code modification change and submitted to vote. I see your change is mostly "documentation" and not actually big change, so I got your point. However, I think it's clearer to keep the same process even for "small" changes. I would recomme

[DISCUSS] Merging specification clarifications

Hi, I have to open pull requests to clarify points on the specification [1][2]. I believe these both document current behavior and don't represent a specification change (and they were already discussed on the mailing list) But given the recent focus on spec update process, I wanted to ask if the