Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 1:51 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Bests, > Dongjoon. > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 6:32 AM filip wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Big thank you to Ted, huge effort! >> >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 12:29 PM Uwe L. Korn wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

+1 (non-binding) Bests, Dongjoon. On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 6:32 AM filip wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Big thank you to Ted, huge effort! > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 12:29 PM Uwe L. Korn wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Uwe >> >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019, at 7:59 AM, Arthur Wiedmer wrote: >> >> +1 (

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

+1 (non-binding) Big thank you to Ted, huge effort! On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 12:29 PM Uwe L. Korn wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Uwe > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2019, at 7:59 AM, Arthur Wiedmer wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019, 16:19 Ryan Blue wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to pro

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

+1 (non-binding) Uwe On Wed, Mar 6, 2019, at 7:59 AM, Arthur Wiedmer wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019, 16:19 Ryan Blue wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'd like to propose accepting the current Python PR, #54 >> . It has been t

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Mar 5, 2019, 16:19 Ryan Blue wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to propose accepting the current Python PR, #54 > . It has been > through a round of reviews and while there is certainly more to do, it is > going to be

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

*Ted Gooch >>> *Reply-To: *"dev@iceberg.apache.org" >>> *Date: *Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 4:21 PM >>> *To: *"dev@iceberg.apache.org" >>> *Cc: *Ryan Blue >>> *Subject: *Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation >>> >

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

t;>> >>> >>> Xabriel J Collazo Mojica | Senior Software Engineer | Adobe | >>> xcoll...@adobe.com >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Ted Gooch >>> Reply-To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org" >>> Dat

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

>> *Xabriel J Collazo Mojica* | Senior Software Engineer | Adobe | >>> xcoll...@adobe.com >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *Ted Gooch >>> *Reply-To: *"dev@iceberg.apache.org" >>> *Date: *Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 4:21 PM >>>

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

t;>> >>> >>> Xabriel J Collazo Mojica | Senior Software Engineer | Adobe | >>> xcoll...@adobe.com >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Ted Gooch >>> Reply-To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org" >>> Dat

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

>> >> >> >> *From: *Ted Gooch >> *Reply-To: *"dev@iceberg.apache.org" >> *Date: *Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 4:21 PM >> *To: *"dev@iceberg.apache.org" >> *Cc: *Ryan Blue >> *Subject: *Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation >>

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 4:21 PM > *To: *"dev@iceberg.apache.org" > *Cc: *Ryan Blue > *Subject: *Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation > > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:19 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 201

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

+1 Xabriel J Collazo Mojica | Senior Software Engineer | Adobe | xcoll...@adobe.com From: Ted Gooch Reply-To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org" Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 4:21 PM To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org" Cc: Ryan Blue Subject: Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementat

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

+1 On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:19 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:18 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'd like to propose accepting the current Python PR, #54 >> . It has been >> through a round of reviews and wh

Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation

+1 On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:18 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to propose accepting the current Python PR, #54 > . It has been > through a round of reviews and while there is certainly more to do, it is > going to be much easie

[VOTE] Add the python implementation

Hi everyone, I'd like to propose accepting the current Python PR, #54 . It has been through a round of reviews and while there is certainly more to do, it is going to be much easier to improve the implementation with smaller pull requests than t