[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-3243) Web Console: undo of Memory section on Caches doesn't reset state of Undo on the top level

2016-06-02 Thread Pavel Konstantinov (JIRA)
Pavel Konstantinov created IGNITE-3243: -- Summary: Web Console: undo of Memory section on Caches doesn't reset state of Undo on the top level Key: IGNITE-3243 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-3242) JMX MBean for ignite-cassandra module

2016-06-02 Thread Igor Rudyak (JIRA)
Igor Rudyak created IGNITE-3242: --- Summary: JMX MBean for ignite-cassandra module Key: IGNITE-3242 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3242 Project: Ignite Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-3241) Rework Hibernate properties table as pair of fields.

2016-06-02 Thread Vasiliy Sisko (JIRA)
Vasiliy Sisko created IGNITE-3241: - Summary: Rework Hibernate properties table as pair of fields. Key: IGNITE-3241 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3241 Project: Ignite Issue

Re: Let's make cache name not null in ignite 2.0

2016-06-02 Thread Ruchir Choudhry
where can i find ignite-spark.jar ? or its placed in ignite-core.jar in the newer versions of Ignite. will appreciate if anyone can help, Regards, Ruchir On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote: > Hi, All! > > In ignite-1.x cache.name could be null. > > And we have to write a

Re: Let's make cache name not null in ignite 2.0

2016-06-02 Thread Raul Kripalani
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote: > User can create cache via Spring XML and simply not specify property > "name". > And Yes, Ignite will take null without any warning. > > I think we at least should start to print warning in current Ignite 1.x. > ​Ok. I would +1 the change

Re: Let's make cache name not null in ignite 2.0

2016-06-02 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Dmitriy, I'm talking about possible *** IGNITE 2.0 *** that may be not released several years :) I think it will contain a LOT of API changes anyway. Adding one more change should not be a show stopper? Or I'm missing something? Raul, User can create cache via Spring XML and simply not specify p

Re: Let's make cache name not null in ignite 2.0

2016-06-02 Thread Raul Kripalani
​Hey,​ On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > Anyone here is even considering the compatibility impact it will have on > our users? I am still struggling to find a single reason for how it would > benefit our user base. > ​I've been away for some time. Under what circumstanc

Re: Let's make cache name not null in ignite 2.0

2016-06-02 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
Anyone here is even considering the compatibility impact it will have on our users? I am still struggling to find a single reason for how it would benefit our user base. On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Sergi Vladykin wrote: > +100500 for dropping it. Having null names is the worst idea I can ima

Re: IgniteCache.invoke on ALL keys

2016-06-02 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
I responded in the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3222 On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: > Dmitriy, affinityCall/Run over a partition is useful, I agree. > > But dealing with partitions manually is also error-prone and not obvious at > all. > Invoke over

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-3240) Arrays do not deserialize properly

2016-06-02 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn (JIRA)
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-3240: -- Summary: Arrays do not deserialize properly Key: IGNITE-3240 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3240 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-3239) "Failed to write class name to file xxxxx.classname" error when several clients and server are running at one host

2016-06-02 Thread Ksenia Rybakova (JIRA)
Ksenia Rybakova created IGNITE-3239: --- Summary: "Failed to write class name to file x.classname" error when several clients and server are running at one host Key: IGNITE-3239 URL: https://issues.apache.org/j

[GitHub] ignite pull request #764: Ignite 3183 to 7.6.1

2016-06-02 Thread avinogradovgg
Github user avinogradovgg closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/764 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] ignite pull request #775: IGNITE-3175 BigDecimal fields are not supported if...

2016-06-02 Thread tledkov-gridgain
GitHub user tledkov-gridgain opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/775 IGNITE-3175 BigDecimal fields are not supported if query is executed … …from IgniteRDD: fix java.sql.Date mapping You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

[GitHub] ignite pull request #774: ignite-3212-7.6.1

2016-06-02 Thread sboikov
GitHub user sboikov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/774 ignite-3212-7.6.1 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-3212-7.6.1 Alternatively you can review and app

[GitHub] ignite pull request #773: IGNITE-3226

2016-06-02 Thread vldpyatkov
GitHub user vldpyatkov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/773 IGNITE-3226 Load test: iteration over cache partitions using scan queries and performing transactions You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://gi

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-3238) Javadoc Warning due to cassandra libs usage

2016-06-02 Thread Anton Vinogradov (JIRA)
Anton Vinogradov created IGNITE-3238: Summary: Javadoc Warning due to cassandra libs usage Key: IGNITE-3238 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3238 Project: Ignite Issue Ty

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-3237) Javadoc Warning due to cassandra libs usage

2016-06-02 Thread Anton Vinogradov (JIRA)
Anton Vinogradov created IGNITE-3237: Summary: Javadoc Warning due to cassandra libs usage Key: IGNITE-3237 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3237 Project: Ignite Issue Ty

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-3236) Fix ESLint complexity warnings.

2016-06-02 Thread Vasiliy Sisko (JIRA)
Vasiliy Sisko created IGNITE-3236: - Summary: Fix ESLint complexity warnings. Key: IGNITE-3236 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3236 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Task Affec

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-3235) Failed to initialize primitive boolean cache property of superclass

2016-06-02 Thread Sergey Lemekhov (JIRA)
Sergey Lemekhov created IGNITE-3235: --- Summary: Failed to initialize primitive boolean cache property of superclass Key: IGNITE-3235 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3235 Project: Ig

Re: IgniteCache.invoke on ALL keys

2016-06-02 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
Dmitriy, affinityCall/Run over a partition is useful, I agree. But dealing with partitions manually is also error-prone and not obvious at all. Invoke over all cache entries is a simple common task, why not provide a simple method of doing it? What kind of memory issues do you expect? Returning E

[GitHub] ignite pull request #771: IGNITE-3231 add the unimplement method

2016-06-02 Thread f7753
Github user f7753 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/771 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl

[GitHub] ignite pull request #659: IGNITE-2383

2016-06-02 Thread vldpyatkov
Github user vldpyatkov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/659 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] ignite pull request #667: IGNITE-3040

2016-06-02 Thread vldpyatkov
Github user vldpyatkov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/667 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] ignite pull request #703: IGNITE-3049

2016-06-02 Thread vldpyatkov
Github user vldpyatkov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/703 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is