Ignite-653 ready

2017-03-24 Thread Jeyhun Karimov
Dear community, I submitted PR [1] some days ago. I did tests in TeamCity [2]. I am getting javadoc/licence related errors. Am I missing something or are these type of errors common and acceptable? [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1661 [2] http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildT

Re: IGNITE - 4760

2017-03-24 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
Vadim, ignite-hibernate module is a part of 'lgpl' profile. Apparently it's not enabled in your environment. -Val On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Вадим Опольский wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I want to resolve issue №4760 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4760 > > To find solutio

Fwd: IGNITE - 4760

2017-03-24 Thread Вадим Опольский
Hello everybody, I want to resolve issue №4760 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4760 To find solution I'm going to change method threadLocalForCache and to add Junit test. Why folder hibernate is not a module ? Can I added it ? Vadim Opolski

Re: Continuations for services

2017-03-24 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
Folks, I tend to think that a separate pool for services is not right solution. We currently execute any new compute job in a separate thread, even if we're already in the public pool (see code in GridJobProcessor#processJobExecuteRequest). What is the reason for this? When a job synchronously ex

Re: Making News page more visible

2017-03-24 Thread Prachi Garg
Agree with both the suggestions. I have attached the patch for the header. Lmk if I should add the social media links on the news page. -P On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Denis Magda wrote: > Igniters, especially Prachi, Mauricio, Dmitriy, > > The news section [1] of the site was evolved sign

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1619: IGNITE-4802

2017-03-24 Thread vkulichenko
Github user vkulichenko closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1619 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i

Making News page more visible

2017-03-24 Thread Denis Magda
Igniters, especially Prachi, Mauricio, Dmitriy, The news section [1] of the site was evolved significantly over the past time. First, I suggest us making it more visible by adding a link to it in the top-most header placing between “blogs” and “twitter”. Second, can we anchor every piece of new

Web Console Monitoring - Running queries page text

2017-03-24 Thread Prachi Garg
Please fix the text for Running queries page (shown when there is no information available)- "Query monitoring is not available for the current cluster. This may be because either no query has been executed or queries' duration is less then the specified in filter." Thanks, -Prachi

Re: Presenting Apache Ignite at European and US conferences

2017-03-24 Thread Denis Magda
Folks, I’m pleased to say that if you live in Russia or have a chance to go there in the very beginning of April then you shouldn’t miss a chance to join Yakov Zhdanov’s and Vladimir Ozerov’s talks they do at JBreak and JPoint conferences: - Yakov: Scalability in Distributed In-Memory Systems,

Re: IgniteMessaging in async mode

2017-03-24 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
I believe it can be blocked if connection can't be established (i.e. socket can't be opened within a timeout). But I don't think that it makes much sense to add async support because of this. Also it would be very confusing as actual send is always asynchronous. -Val On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:10

Re: Should we take care of Java 9 in Ignite 2.0 scope?

2017-03-24 Thread Denis Magda
Evgenii, Thanks for the investigation. Could you update the ticket with all of your findings and suggestions? If you feel you can’t fix it by 2.0 then let’s do it in the next minor release like 2.x. I don’t think that we introduce any breaking compatibilities when JDK 9 support is added later.

Re: ready for review IGNITE-933

2017-03-24 Thread Denis Magda
Hi Vadim, Great, thanks for catching up this ticket! I’ve created a TeamCity configuration for Hibernate 5: http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_IgniteHibernate5&branch_IgniteTests=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv

Re: New version of Web Console released.

2017-03-24 Thread Denis Magda
Great job Alex! Thanks for making the console more compelling with every release! — Denis > On Mar 24, 2017, at 12:06 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov > wrote: > > Igniters! > > I'd like to announce that we just pushed new version of Ignite Web Console to > master branch > and redeployed the new versi

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1672: MemoryMetrics to monitor how PageMemories perform...

2017-03-24 Thread sergey-chugunov-1985
GitHub user sergey-chugunov-1985 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1672 MemoryMetrics to monitor how PageMemories performing You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite

Re: Should we take care of Java 9 in Ignite 2.0 scope?

2017-03-24 Thread Evgenii Zhuravlev
Igniters, I found that maven-war-plugin, that used in ignite-websphere-test doesn't work with java 9. Here is issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWAR-397.They have workaround with setting MAVEN_OPTS, but this workaround doesn't fit us. 2017-03-24 0:51 GMT+03:00 zixu mo : > > > JB IDEA2

Re: IgniteMessaging in async mode

2017-03-24 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
I am a bit confused. The "send()" method does not wait for any replies, why would it block? On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Dmitry Karachentsev < dkarachent...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Hi Igniters! > > We have in IgniteMessaging interface async support, and it's used only for > registering/deregis

Re: Logging ignite-log4j.jar

2017-03-24 Thread Andrey Mashenkov
Upd: link to ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4863 On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Andrey Mashenkov < andrey.mashen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Crossposting to dev: > > For now, all is ok if ConsoleAppender for RootLogger is configured by user. > Otherwise, we try to add ConsoleApp

Re: Logging ignite-log4j.jar

2017-03-24 Thread Andrey Mashenkov
Crossposting to dev: For now, all is ok if ConsoleAppender for RootLogger is configured by user. Otherwise, we try to add ConsoleAppender when logger is created. Once ConsoleAppender added then rootLogger logging level set to INFO without any checks. If ConsoleLogger auto-creation is disabled by u

Re: IGNITE-4052 ready for review

2017-03-24 Thread Nikolai Tikhonov
Great! Looking forward to the contribution. On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Вадим Опольский wrote: > Nikolay, I will add properties for mesos role and unit test next week. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Вадим Опольский > Date: 2017-03-22 15:53 GMT+03:00 > Subject: Re: IGNI

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4863) Log4jLogger can change RootLoggel logging level unexpectedly.

2017-03-24 Thread Andrew Mashenkov (JIRA)
Andrew Mashenkov created IGNITE-4863: Summary: Log4jLogger can change RootLoggel logging level unexpectedly. Key: IGNITE-4863 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4863 Project: Ignite

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1671: ignite-4626

2017-03-24 Thread kdudkov
GitHub user kdudkov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1671 ignite-4626 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-4626-2 Alternatively you can review and apply these

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4862) NPE in reading data from IGFS

2017-03-24 Thread Dmitry Karachentsev (JIRA)
Dmitry Karachentsev created IGNITE-4862: --- Summary: NPE in reading data from IGFS Key: IGNITE-4862 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4862 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug

Fwd: IGNITE-4052 ready for review

2017-03-24 Thread Вадим Опольский
Nikolay, I will add properties for mesos role and unit test next week. -- Forwarded message -- From: Вадим Опольский Date: 2017-03-22 15:53 GMT+03:00 Subject: Re: IGNITE-4052 ready for review To: dev@ignite.apache.org Nikolay, just changed status to "path available". 2017-03-22

ready for review IGNITE-933

2017-03-24 Thread Вадим Опольский
Hello everyone! Denis, Valentin, what should I do to close issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794 ? The tests in Team City executed successfully. Valentin, I renamed IgniteHibernateTestSuite -> IgniteHibernate5TestSuite. Can you create TeamCity Configuration ? Vadim Opolski 20

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1670: IGNITE-4102 .NET: Generify ICacheStore

2017-03-24 Thread ptupitsyn
GitHub user ptupitsyn opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1670 IGNITE-4102 .NET: Generify ICacheStore You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-4102 Alternatively you

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1478: ignite-4626

2017-03-24 Thread kdudkov
Github user kdudkov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1478 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

IgniteMessaging in async mode

2017-03-24 Thread Dmitry Karachentsev
Hi Igniters! We have in IgniteMessaging interface async support, and it's used only for registering/deregistering listeners, not for message sending. But user may fall into the case, when connection to destination node was lost and user's thread is blocked on IgniteMessaging.send()/sendOrdere

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1300: Ignite 4223

2017-03-24 Thread kdudkov
Github user kdudkov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1300 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1283: Ignite 4305

2017-03-24 Thread kdudkov
Github user kdudkov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1283 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1232: Ignite 3074 2

2017-03-24 Thread kdudkov
Github user kdudkov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1232 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

Re: Question about OBJ binary representation

2017-03-24 Thread Vyacheslav Daradur
Alexander, Alexey thanks for your explanations. 2017-03-24 12:13 GMT+03:00 Alexey Goncharuk : > I guess when the class is not in the classpath of the Ignite node :) To > deserialize the value, either > * the class should be either in the classpath > * or it should be accessible via the configur

Re: Question about OBJ binary representation

2017-03-24 Thread Alexey Goncharuk
I guess when the class is not in the classpath of the Ignite node :) To deserialize the value, either * the class should be either in the classpath * or it should be accessible via the configured class loader * or optimized marshaller should be used and peer class loading is enabled. 2017-03-24

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4861) Export rebalance metrics and state as MBeans

2017-03-24 Thread Alexey Goncharuk (JIRA)
Alexey Goncharuk created IGNITE-4861: Summary: Export rebalance metrics and state as MBeans Key: IGNITE-4861 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4861 Project: Ignite Issue T

Re: Question about OBJ binary representation

2017-03-24 Thread Vyacheslav Daradur
Alexey, one more question. In which cases, classLoader won't find Class by class-name? 2017-03-24 10:00 GMT+03:00 Alexey Goncharuk : > Vyacheslav, > > As for the real scenarios for a class name not be registered, this can > happen when Ignite attempts to register a mapping on a locked topology (

Re: remap response during prepare phase

2017-03-24 Thread Alexey Goncharuk
When a client maps transaction commit, it does this optimistically on the latest version of the topology available for the client. If the topology changes on the server during request transfer, it will send the remap response with the observed version of the topology. The client will wait for this

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4860) Empty leafs in BPlusTree

2017-03-24 Thread Igor Seliverstov (JIRA)
Igor Seliverstov created IGNITE-4860: Summary: Empty leafs in BPlusTree Key: IGNITE-4860 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4860 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug C

Re: Can I let Ignite to do rebalance at a particular time?

2017-03-24 Thread Dmitry Karachentsev
Hi, Totally agree wit that. And it should be possible to start re-balancing from client node too. > But I think it is more convenient to start rebalancing manually from management console, is it right? I don't see the difference on how to start re-balancing: from Ignite API or console, res

remap response during prepare phase

2017-03-24 Thread ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV
Hi, igniters! My questions is the following. what is "remap response" GridNearTxPrepareResponse in processNearTxPrepareRequest? -- *Best Regards,* *Kuznetsov Aleksey*

New version of Web Console released.

2017-03-24 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Igniters! I'd like to announce that we just pushed new version of Ignite Web Console to master branch and redeployed the new version on GridGain infrastructure ( https://console.gridgain.com) where you can give it a try right a way. NOTE: You may need to refresh page (F5 or Ctrl+R) in order to r

Re: Question about OBJ binary representation

2017-03-24 Thread Alexey Goncharuk
Vyacheslav, As for the real scenarios for a class name not be registered, this can happen when Ignite attempts to register a mapping on a locked topology (for example, inside a started user transaction) and the primary node for the corresponding mapping key has left. In this case, the mapping atte