Hi,
A know GlobalSing support open source projects for
free(https://www.globalsign.com/en/ssl/ssl-open-source/).
We can request certificates from them, it will be more easy for me. Any
objection?
Denis Magda-2 wrote
> Hi Cos,
>
> Alexey Chetaev, please join the conversation and share your thoug
Folks,
Do we currently have any way to set a timeout for an atomic operation? I
don't see neither a way to do this nor any related documentation.
In the code there are CacheAtomicUpdateTimeoutException
and CacheAtomicUpdateTimeoutCheckedException, but I can't find a single
place where it's create
Keep an eye on the voting threads named like this one "[VOTE] Apache Ignite
2.1.0 RC2”.
One the vote is passed and all the issues are resolved the release is to be
rolled out. In any case, an announcement will be sent to the @dev list as well.
—
Denis
> On Jul 19, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Muthu wro
Hi Cos,
Alexey Chetaev, please join the conversation and share your thoughts on this.
—
Denis
> On Jul 19, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> Hey guys.
>
> I've noticed that https://ci.ignite.apache.org/ has two issues:
> - it has the invalid certificate
> - the CI server isn't r
Sounds good!
D.
On Jul 19, 2017, 1:54 PM, at 1:54 PM, Ivan Rakov wrote:
>Dmitriy,
>
>I agree, hashFunctionScore is more comprehensible.
>I'd correct it to "pageHashFunctionScore" to make it clear that it's
>about function that distributes pages, not about hashCode() of
>user-provided keys.
>
>
Dmitriy,
I agree, hashFunctionScore is more comprehensible.
I'd correct it to "pageHashFunctionScore" to make it clear that it's
about function that distributes pages, not about hashCode() of
user-provided keys.
--
Best Regards,
Ivan Rakov
On 18.07.2017 19:34, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
Ivan,
Yury, thanks for the update! It would be nice if you wrote a blog about
IgniteML where you would demonstrate a few examples. This would make it
easier for the community to digest the new features.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Yury Babak wrote:
> Hi Igniters,
>
> Here is the some update abou
Thanks Vyacheslav!..i am looking forward to it.
Regards,
Muthu
-- The real danger with modern technology isn't that machines will begin to
think like people, but that people will begin to think like machines.
-- Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to
see what you
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-5787:
--
Summary: .NET: Ignite entities (ICache, ICompute) cause weird
serialization errors when used as fields in user object
Key: IGNITE-5787
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-5786:
--
Summary: .NET: Transaction fails with multiple write-through caches
Key: IGNITE-5786
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5786
Project: Ignite
Hey guys.
I've noticed that https://ci.ignite.apache.org/ has two issues:
- it has the invalid certificate
- the CI server isn't responding on the https port (there's only ngnix)
I don't about the rest of the group here, but all my browsers are enforcing
HTTPS connections for the obvious reasons.
Hi Igniters,
Here is the some update about Ignite ML. Last 2 month we working on a few
new cool features.
First of all it's decision tree algorithm with next step - random forest.
Currently this feature under development by Artem Malykh.
The same for the second major change - BLAS. BLAS is high
GitHub user ezhuravl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2323
Ignite 1.7.4 p2
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-1.7.4-p2
Alternatively you can review and apply
I've investigated the issue.
There are different branches with the tag: "2.1.0-rc2"
*ignite-2.1* - last commit by 'devozerov'
(355ffda1e8aa88fd904d037995c061380aa1b74d)
*2.1.0-rc2* - last commit by 'Ignite Teamcity'
(9423e6380ace04e1d5aa4098b9762d9fa0006be6)
The main defference between the branches
Scheduled "Run All" in Ignite 2.0 Tests for pull/2285/head -
http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewQueued.html?itemId=734208
On 19.07.2017 17:55, Dmitry Pavlov wrote:
Hi Evgeniy,
Thank you. Ignite Basic is one suite from approximately 80 suites that
covers Ignite by automated tests. Which is why I
Hi Dmitriy,
The ticket was a regression from 1.9 to 2.0. I don't think anyone would be
expecting the behavior in 2.0 as it doesn't align with the javadoc and has
only been broken since the 2.0 release.
-Nick
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017, 6:55 AM Dmitry Pavlov wrote:
> Hi Evgeniy,
>
> Thank you. Ignite
Hi Evgeniy,
Thank you. Ignite Basic is one suite from approximately 80 suites that
covers Ignite by automated tests. Which is why I suggested to use RunAll
chain in ignite 2.0 group. Yes, several tests may fail, especially if it is
flaky tests or failure is related to the specific JIRA issue.
Abo
http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=720722&tab=buildResultsDiv&buildTypeId=IgniteTests_IgniteBasic
- this one - there seem to be no new failed platform tests, other failed
tests seem to fail in several other reviews too and are unrelated to my
changes.
On 19.07.2017 17:35, Dmitry
Hi Evgeniy,
I was not able to find Teamcity run for this change.
Could you please run http://ci.ignite.apache.org test for example on branch
pull/2285/head using 'Ignite 2.0 Tests' target 'Run All'.
Or could you please share link to previous run on this changes?
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
ср, 19
GitHub user BiryukovVA opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2322
IGNITE-3950: Issue is not reproduce.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/BiryukovVA/ignite IGNITE-3950
Alternatively you can re
Hi Sergey,
I don't think that this really will be needed, but let's allow for local
config to override all 'rebalanceXXX' properties.
Also please make sure we print warning if any of these properties differs
from config received from grid.
Thanks!
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Sergey Chugunov
GitHub user Desperus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2321
IGNITE-5781 Visor throws ClassCastException if cache store implementaâ¦
â¦tion is other than CacheJdbcPojoStore
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Maxim, Vyacheslav,
Any ideas why we can't build from zip?
Tag' and zip' content should be the same.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Kozlov Maxim wrote:
> Vyacheslav, this same problem on maven 3.5.0 (zip archive), but build
> success git tag name 2.1.0-rc2.
>
> > 19 июля 2017 г., в 14:51, Vyac
Igniters,
Could somebody review the fix today?
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Evgeniy Ignatiev <
yevgeniy.ignat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, Igniters.
>
> Could anyone review my request - https://issues.apache.org/jira
> /browse/IGNITE-5123? - My previous pings seems to got lost.
>
> Best reg
Vyacheslav, this same problem on maven 3.5.0 (zip archive), but build success
git tag name 2.1.0-rc2.
> 19 июля 2017 г., в 14:51, Vyacheslav Daradur написал(а):
>
> Oleg, Sergey thanks for the notes.
>
> If the build procedure had been changed, I think it needs to update wiki:
> https://cwiki
Oleg, Sergey thanks for the notes.
If the build procedure had been changed, I think it needs to update wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ProjectBuild
I have another problem now.
I execute:
1) mvn clean package -Pall-java,all-scala,licenses
Folks,
Any one knows when 2.1 would be coming out?
As per this, the release date is July 17th...this past Monday,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.1
Regards,
Muthu
-- The real danger with modern technology isn't that machines will begin to
think like people, b
Hello, Igniters.
Could anyone review my request -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5123? - My previous pings
seems to got lost.
Best regards,
Yevgeniy
Github user Desperus closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2258
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Hi Vyacheslav
The build procedure has been changed for 2.1 Take a look in DEVNOTES.txt
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur
wrote:
> Hi guys.
> I've downloaded apache-ignite-2.1.0-src.zip, unpack it and execute "mvn
> package -DskipTests"
> result is succes, but the folder "targ
Hi Vyacheslav
Yes, we changed build procedure, please look in the DEVNOTES.txt.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur
wrote:
> Hi guys.
> I've downloaded apache-ignite-2.1.0-src.zip, unpack it and execute "mvn
> package -DskipTests"
> result is succes, but the folder "target" in t
Hi guys.
I've downloaded apache-ignite-2.1.0-src.zip, unpack it and execute "mvn
package -DskipTests"
result is succes, but the folder "target" in the root directory is empty.
I've checked it at two diffrenet machines.
Is logic of packaging changed in the release?
2017-07-19 12:36 GMT+03:00 Anton
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Kozlov Maxim wrote:
> +1
>
> > 19 июля 2017 г., в 11:33, Semyon Boikov
> написал(а):
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> On Tu
+1
> 19 июля 2017 г., в 11:33, Semyon Boikov написал(а):
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> —
>>> Denis
GitHub user AMashenkov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2320
Ignite 1.7.12 p1
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-1.7.12-p1
Alternatively you can review and a
Github user voipp closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2061
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user voipp closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2302
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Jul 17, 2017, at 9:42 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
Michael Griggs created IGNITE-5785:
--
Summary: C# QuerySqlField attribute should provide access to Order
parameter
Key: IGNITE-5785
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5785
Project: Igni
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-5784:
--
Summary: .NET: QueryIndex.InlineSize
Key: IGNITE-5784
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5784
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Improvement
Michael Griggs created IGNITE-5783:
--
Summary: LINQ queries should provide the ability to generate the
SQL query plan
Key: IGNITE-5783
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5783
Project: I
As far as I know, It will be shortly after the end of the vote. [1]
Of course only in case of vote success.
Vote started yesterday, and must finish tomorrow.
Let's hope to see the new release by the end of this week.
[1]
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-Ignite-2-1-
42 matches
Mail list logo
