[DISCUSS] Proposal for Ignite Extensions as a separate Bahir module or Incubator project

2019-10-18 Thread Saikat Maitra
Hello, We wanted to discuss on a proposal to move and support the Apache Ignite integrations as separate Ignite Extensions as discussed here http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Pub-Sub-Streamer-Implementation-td43944.html . The reason we wanted to move our Apache Ignite

Re: [DISCUSS] Pub/Sub Streamer Implementation

2019-10-18 Thread Saikat Maitra
Hello Denis, Sure, sounds good. I will create a separate discussion thread to get community feedback on whether we should join the Bahir or kick-off "Ignite Extensions" project. Regards, Saikat On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 2:21 PM Denis Magda wrote: > Folks, > > The concept of Apache Bahir is

Re: Ignite diagnostic (SQL system views)

2019-10-18 Thread Denis Magda
Alex, Nikolay, thanks! Forgive me for my poor googling skills ;) - Denis On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:26 AM Alex Plehanov wrote: > Documentation for views released in 2.7 is here: > https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs/system-views > > пт, 18 окт. 2019 г. в 17:24, Nikolay Izhikov : > > >

RE: Thin clients: WithExpiryPolicy

2019-10-18 Thread Alexandr Shapkin
Pavel, Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Right now I see that 2 reserved bytes come with every cache request: cacheId and flags. The first one is obvious, but the second one is used only for java thin client with enabled KeepBinary mode. I think we could use the flags byte and write an

Re: Thin clients: WithExpiryPolicy

2019-10-18 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
Stateless approach looks a lot better to me. We have a choice: * Keep expiry policy on server and send an ID with every request (like a query cursor ID - 8 bytes) * Send full expiry policy with every expiry-enabled request (24 bytes - or maybe less? We should think about the format) Stateful

Re: Ignite diagnostic (SQL system views)

2019-10-18 Thread Alex Plehanov
Documentation for views released in 2.7 is here: https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs/system-views пт, 18 окт. 2019 г. в 17:24, Nikolay Izhikov : > Denis, AFAIK we doesn't have documentation for the SQL System Views > existing in Ignite. > > I have plans to write a documentation about metrics

Re: Ignite diagnostic (SQL system views)

2019-10-18 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Denis, AFAIK we doesn't have documentation for the SQL System Views existing in Ignite. I have plans to write a documentation about metrics and syste views that will cover SQL System View. It will be available till 2.8 release. В Пт, 18/10/2019 в 07:16 -0700, Denis Magda пишет: > Alex,

Re: Ignite diagnostic (SQL system views)

2019-10-18 Thread Denis Magda
Alex, Igniters, Who of us was contributing this feature? I don’t see any documentation, not clear how the users are expected to benefit from the capability and how everybody will be aware of the feature existence. We need to close the gap and spread the word. Denis On Thursday, October 17,

Thin clients: WithExpiryPolicy

2019-10-18 Thread Alexandr Shapkin
Igniters, I would like to add WithExpirePolicy support to thin clients. [1] For a thick client, we can obtain a reference to a cache wrapper instance and use cache API through it. At the same time, the thin client protocol is stateless, we do not hold a reference to a cache but rather a cache

Re: TDE Master key rotation (Phase-2)

2019-10-18 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Hello, Nikita. Thank you. I will take a look. shortly. чт, 17 окт. 2019 г. в 18:23, Maxim Muzafarov : > Nikita, > > > Can we include it into a 2.8 release scope? > I think it is possible since the release scope freeze date has not > happened yet. > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 17:36, Nikita

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12303) Change comment for an enumeration item CACHE_DESTROY

2019-10-18 Thread Surkov Aleksandr (Jira)
Surkov Aleksandr created IGNITE-12303: - Summary: Change comment for an enumeration item CACHE_DESTROY Key: IGNITE-12303 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12303 Project: Ignite

Re: Binary object format KB article

2019-10-18 Thread Igor Sapego
Great job, I think we should have details like this in documentation, not only in wiki Denis, what do you think? Best Regards, Igor On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 7:19 PM Ivan Pavlukhin wrote: > Sergey, > > Thank you for a review! > > > It seems to me that document tries to focus on details of the

Re: Embedded Version of H2

2019-10-18 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
A folow-up, there is an interesting ticket [1]. Need to check if window functions are covered. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7664 пт, 18 окт. 2019 г. в 10:01, Ivan Pavlukhin : > > Hi Steve, > > I am afraid that window functions and OVER keyword will not work > properly in new

Re: Embedded Version of H2

2019-10-18 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
Hi Steve, I am afraid that window functions and OVER keyword will not work properly in new Ignite version with upgraded H2. Could you share some simple query with OVER keyword you are going to execute? Then I can check it against current master version. чт, 17 окт. 2019 г. в 14:44,

Re: Ignite diagnostic (SQL system views)

2019-10-18 Thread Alex Plehanov
Denis, Views engine and some views were released in AI 2.7. In 2.8 they will be moved to the new engine and new views will be added (as part of IEP-35) пт, 18 окт. 2019 г. в 00:50, Denis Magda : > Anton, Maxim, > > Are we planning to release the views as part of 2.8? Don't see them listed > in