Re: [VOTE] Ignite Packaging IEP

2022-08-29 Thread Алексей
+1 On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 at 17:07 Mikhail Pochatkin wrote: > Hi Igniters, > > I want to start a voting process about several points from IEP-93 [1]. > > 1. Switch Apache Ignite build system to Gradle as default. > 2. Consequently, after changing the build system to Gradle we need to add > new thir

Re: [VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3 (reopened)

2022-06-01 Thread Алексей
+1 ср, 1 июн. 2022 г. в 12:19, Alexander Lapin : > +1 > > ср, 1 июн. 2022 г. в 12:14, ткаленко кирилл : > > > + 1 > > >

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

2021-06-03 Thread Алексей Гидаспов
rgence/release candidate build, please let know. > > Sincerely, > Dmitriy Pavlov > > On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов wrote: > > Dear Ignite Community! > > > > I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also suggest > > mysel

Re: Edit access to Apache Ignite wiki

2021-06-03 Thread Алексей Гидаспов
wrote: > > My login is: agidaspov > > E-mail: olive.c...@gmail.com > > > > On 2021/06/03 08:17:15, Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > > > Can you please sign in to cwiki and share your login? > > > > > > wiki admins (PMC members) could grant access in tha

Re: Edit access to Apache Ignite wiki

2021-06-03 Thread Алексей Гидаспов
My login is: agidaspov E-mail: olive.c...@gmail.com On 2021/06/03 08:17:15, Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > Can you please sign in to cwiki and share your login? > > wiki admins (PMC members) could grant access in that case. > > On 2021/06/03 07:11:54, Алексей Гидаспов wrote: &

Edit access to Apache Ignite wiki

2021-06-03 Thread Алексей Гидаспов
Hi, Igniters! As a release manager of 2.11 Apache Ignite release I need edit access to cwiki.apache.org Apache Ignite space. Please tell me, how can I obtain it?

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

2021-05-17 Thread Алексей Гидаспов
t; > I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it. But if > > someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to be > > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please let > know. > > > > Sincerely, > > D

Apache Ignite 2.11

2021-05-13 Thread Алексей Гидаспов
Dear Ignite Community! I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also suggest myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release at the end of june 2021. ___ Best Regards, Alexey Gidaspov

Hello all

2020-02-18 Thread Алексей Высотин
Hello Ignite Community, My name is Alexey and I'm a Java and Scala developer with a current focus on Big Data stack like Spark and Hadoop. I would like to take part in the Apache Ignite project and make a contribution to it. I'm thinking to start with some easy fix or bugfix to get more acquainte

Re: Re[2]: [VOTE] Apache Ignite PMC Chair

2019-10-31 Thread Алексей Платонов
+1 for Dmitry Pavlov чт, 31 окт. 2019 г. в 01:23, Valentin Kulichenko < valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com>: > +1 Dmitry Pavlov (binding) > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:55 PM Alex Plehanov > wrote: > > > + 1 Dmitry Pavlov > > > > ср, 30 окт. 2019 г. в 20:50, Pavel Kovalenko : > > > > > +1 for Dmitry

Re: [ML] Distributed metrics computation

2019-09-10 Thread Алексей Платонов
ith some > cache?) on demand. > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 2:09 PM Алексей Платонов > wrote: > > > > I mean metrics for model evaluation like Accuracy or Precision/Recall for > > ML models. It isn't same as system metrics (like throughput). Such >

Re: [ML] Distributed metrics computation

2019-09-10 Thread Алексей Платонов
stributed metrics in the first place? > It seems, there are many metric processing system out there: Prometheus, > Zabbix, Splunk, etc. > > Each of then can aggregate metrics in many ways. > > I think, we should not use Ignite as an metrics aggregation system. > > What do you th

[ML] Distributed metrics computation

2019-09-10 Thread Алексей Платонов
Hi Igniters! I've been working on a prototype of distributed metrics computation for ML-models. Unfortunately, we don't have an ability to compute metrics in a distributed manner, so, it leads to gathering metric statistics to client node via ScanQuery and all flow of vectors from partitions will b

Re: [ML] Deployment of user-defined preprocessors

2019-09-08 Thread Алексей Платонов
5 июн. 2019 г. в 17:20, Yuriy Babak : > Alexey, > > This is a cool change, do you create a ticket for it? > > If no I can create one. > > Best regards, > Yuriy Babak > > > пт, 31 мая 2019 г. в 14:20, Алексей Платонов : > > > Hi, Igniters! > > Curre

XA transactions support

2019-07-29 Thread Алексей Самойленко
Hello, it would be nice to have a subj in Ignite. Thx

Re: [ML] Deployment of user-defined preprocessors

2019-05-31 Thread Алексей Платонов
27;t require to change APIs of these classes. Sincerely Alexey Platonov пт, 31 мая 2019 г. в 14:51, Alexey Zinoviev : > It sounds great, could you please explain what are you going to change in > the main Vectorizer/Preprocessor API to support it? > > пт, 31 мая 2019 г. в 14:20, Алексей Пл

[ML] Deployment of user-defined preprocessors

2019-05-31 Thread Алексей Платонов
Hi, Igniters! Currently we don't have an ability to deploy automatically user-defined preprocessors and vectorizers. Client's code should be deployed manually to Ignite server nodes. I have an idea how to fix it. If we pass user's classloader and one of user-defined classes from fit-level to Compu

Re: [ML][DISCUSSION] The future of Vectorizer

2019-03-29 Thread Алексей Платонов
Hey, Igniters! I prepared some PR for Serializable support in our Vectors. Could you review this: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6378 ? чт, 28 мар. 2019 г. в 11:47, Алексей Платонов : > Yep, I definitely agree with you. > > Moreover, such improvement should reduce parallel hiera

Re: [ML][DISCUSSION] The future of Vectorizer

2019-03-28 Thread Алексей Платонов
Yep, I definitely agree with you. Moreover, such improvement should reduce parallel hierarchies in trainers and preprocessors, from this point of view preprocessor will be equal to a trainer. In my opinion, this improvement is very important for ml module because it can give a flexible hierarchy o

Re: Tests for ML using binary builds

2019-03-02 Thread Алексей Платонов
gnite sub-projects as well. > > пт, 1 мар. 2019 г. в 19:04, Алексей Платонов : > > > > Hello, Igniters! > > I would like to create several tests for ML algorithms using binary > builds. > > These tests should work in this way: > > 1) Get last master (or user

Tests for ML using binary builds

2019-03-01 Thread Алексей Платонов
Hello, Igniters! I would like to create several tests for ML algorithms using binary builds. These tests should work in this way: 1) Get last master (or user-defined branch) from git repository; 2) Build Ignite with a release profile and create binary build; 3) Run several Ignite instances from bin

Contribution permission and ignite-2196

2019-02-05 Thread Наумов Алексей
Hello! I would like to contribute to apache ignite and i am asking for contribution permission. I would like to start with ignite-2196 to get familiar with contribution process. The issue Is still reproducable. I am plannig to remove the link and wrap it into @code directive as suggested in comm

Contribution permission and ignite-2196

2019-02-04 Thread Наумов Алексей
Hello! I would like to contribute to apache ignite and i am asking for contribution permission. I would like to start with ignite-2196 to get familiar with contribution process. The issue Is still reproducable (broken link from documentation - https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/javadoc/i

Re: [ML] Metric calculation for classification models

2018-12-13 Thread Алексей Платонов
You can compute just TP (true-positive), FP, TN and FN counters and use them to evaluate Recall, Precision, Accuracy, ect. If you want to specify class for Pr evaluation, then you can compute Pr for first label as TP/(TP+FP) and for second label as TN/(TN+FN) for example. After it we can unite all

Re: Upgrading Ignite to JCache 1.1

2018-06-05 Thread Кузнецов Алексей Львович
Hi After Alexander create separate tickets for failed tests, everybody is free to fix them. So we can proceed faster issue resolving. Hello, Igniters. Actually, I don't understand why we should merge in master something broken. Currently, Ignite is not ready for JCache 1.1. Only change I see

Re: [IGNITE-5714] Design proposal of suspend/resume for pessimistic tx

2018-04-20 Thread Кузнецов Алексей Львович
PR for this issue is ready to be reviewed. Changes are relatively small. 1. No network messages have been changed. 2. Thread id usage replaced with xid usage when we work with candidates. 3. All current tests are passed [3] Please, review. [1], [2] [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNI

Re[2]: Welcome

2018-03-27 Thread Протченко Алексей
Hello all Thank you, Alexey! >Вторник, 27 марта 2018, 21:57 +06:00 от Alexey Goncharuk >: > >Hello Alexey, > >Welcome to the Ignite community! I've added you to the contributors list, >you should be now able to assign the JIRA ticket. > >--AG > >2018-03-27 18:42 GMT+03:00 Spider (Alexey) < spid

Hello

2018-01-04 Thread Алексей Рохин
I would like to join apache ignite development. My JIRA ID is rokhin Going to start from IGNITE-7281. BR

iginite participation

2018-01-04 Thread Алексей Рохин
I would like to join apache ignite development. My JIRA ID is r okhin Going to start from IGNITE-7281. BR

Grant contributors access

2017-05-31 Thread Алексей Четаев
Dear Ignite community, Can you please grant me (lexa) contributor access, so that I can assign Ignite Jira issues to myself ? Best Regards Aleksey Chetaev.