Re: Integration with RocketMQ

Roman, Do you have any progress on this? It will be perfect to have the feature in 1.9. Please join the discussion: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-1-9-td14170.html — Deni

Re: Integration with RocketMQ

Denis, Yes, I plan to complete it by that time. #Btw, RocketMQ first release (4.0.0) under Apache license is planned for this month. Roman On Thursday, January 12, 2017 7:30 AM, Denis Magda wrote: Roman, Makes perfect sense to me. Do you think we can release this feature in the neare

Re: Integration with RocketMQ

Roman, Makes perfect sense to me. Do you think we can release this feature in the nearest AI release (1.9 or 2.0) around February/March? — Denis > On Jan 10, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Roman Shtykh wrote: > > Denis, > I think our Kafka integration is the closest to what may be required for > RockerMQ

Re: Integration with RocketMQ

Denis, I think our Kafka integration is the closest to what may be required for RockerMQ. But also I wouldn't exclude expanding to Camel's approach in future, thanks a lot for pointing to it! Let's have it with other streamers as Yakov suggested, and let's discuss again if something fancy is req

Re: Integration with RocketMQ

Roman, Does it make sense to have corresponding integration modules in both projects? For instance, there is Camel and Ignite integration that is hosted in both projects. https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/camel https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignit

Re: Integration with RocketMQ

I would place it under Ignite for consistency with other streamers. --Yakov

Integration with RocketMQ

Igniters, Recently I am looking into a new pub/sub messaging Apache incubator project called RocketMQ [1], originally developed at Alibaba. And I am thinking about implementing a streamer for Ignite. Do you think it has to be placed under modules/ of Ignite project, or better to have it together