..@apache.org
> > Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 00:32:37 -0800
> > Subject: Re: LOCAL cache serializes the entries?
> > To: dev@ignite.apache.org
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Andrey Kornev
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This design is unfo
a.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_astonishment).
Regards
Andrey
> From: dsetrak...@apache.org
> Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 00:32:37 -0800
> Subject: Re: LOCAL cache serializes the entries?
> To: dev@ignite.apache.org
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Andrey Kornev
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Th
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Andrey Kornev
wrote:
>
> This design is unfortunate, but I understand the reason. My issue is not
> with performance impact of serialization, but with having to make my
> key/value serializable which is not always possible nor desirable.
Andrey, as you aware, in
ache.org
> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:34:28 -0800
> Subject: Re: LOCAL cache serializes the entries?
> To: dev@ignite.apache.org
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Andrey Kornev
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > It seems that even if the cache is configured as LO
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Andrey Kornev
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that even if the cache is configured as LOCAL, the entries are
> nevertheless stored in serialized form. If that's the case, could someone
> explain the reasons?
>
Andrey, JCache has pass-by-value semantics by default, wh
Hello,
It seems that even if the cache is configured as LOCAL, the entries are
nevertheless stored in serialized form. If that's the case, could someone
explain the reasons?
Regards
Andrey
