Re: Static hierarchy in jmx tree

2021-09-08 Thread Igor Akkuratov
onitoring systems that can work another way. > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 at 4:51 PM > From: "Alexei Scherbakov" > To: "dev" > Subject: Re: Static hierarchy in jmx tree > > I'm ok to use either classloader or node id. > > I'm ok to alw

Re: Static hierarchy in jmx tree

2021-08-19 Thread Alexei Scherbakov
more > appropriate for me to use node id instead of classloader. So my idea is to > use either instance name or consistentId or nodeId is there any cons why > it's better to do that your way? > > > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2021 at 4:21 PM > > From: "Stanislav L

Re: Static hierarchy in jmx tree

2021-06-13 Thread Igor Akkuratov
Lukyanov" > To: dev@ignite.apache.org > Subject: Re: Static hierarchy in jmx tree > > I guess the problem with this thread is that, on one hand, virtually anyone > would support the change because no one likes the class loader IDs in JMX. > On the other hand, this is a breaking cha

Re: Static hierarchy in jmx tree

2021-05-10 Thread Igor Akkuratov
Alexei, thank you for your response. > 1. I don't understand why setting > IGNITE_MBEAN_APPEND_CLASS_LOADER_ID=false + igniteInstanceName is not a > solution to your issue ? > Just put it in the documentation and this should do fine. It could be a solution for me, but I believe that such approach

Re: Static hierarchy in jmx tree

2021-04-28 Thread Alexei Scherbakov
Igor Akkuratov, I have several concerns about your patch. 1. I don't understand why setting IGNITE_MBEAN_APPEND_CLASS_LOADER_ID=false + igniteInstanceName is not a solution to your issue ? Just put it in the documentation and this should do fine. 2. Removing the classloader id can break the temp

Re: Static hierarchy in jmx tree

2021-04-16 Thread Igor Akkuratov
Is there anybody alive?

Re: Static hierarchy in jmx tree

2021-04-10 Thread Igor Akkuratov
Hello, everyone! Because there was no cons, I have started developing and I have pull request https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8972 now. Review it please. > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2020 at 4:58 PM > From: "¿ ¿" > To: dev@ignite.apache.org > Subject: S

Static hierarchy in jmx tree

2020-12-18 Thread ¿¿¿¿¿ ¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿
Hello, everyone! Ignite has a changeable jmx hierarchy now. It may lead a lot of problems for product maintenance and monitoring: - By default where would be classloader that change every time that node has been restarted. It will lead to rediscover all metrics for node. - It's hard to c

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12920) Static hierarchy in jmx tree

2020-04-20 Thread Igor Akkuratov (Jira)
Igor Akkuratov created IGNITE-12920: --- Summary: Static hierarchy in jmx tree Key: IGNITE-12920 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12920 Project: Ignite Issue Type