[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'IoTDB-Pipeline/master [master] [137]'

BUILD-STABLE: Job 'IoTDB-Pipeline/master [master] [137]': Is back to normal.

Re: Cherry-picking without PR

Hi, > - if the change is very minor and committer feels its okay to do it in develop / master directly then he does it > - If change is major or important than we make a PR and ask for review Or I think we need record which PR has been cherry-picked at least. Like [1]. [1]

Re: Binary Release of IoTDB

Hi, Structure 4 + 1. the Structure 4 is widely acclaimed, let's just do it! I have created two sub-tasks on JIRA: - IOTDB-147: a new script for copy jars into the folder and get *.tar.gz - IOTDB-148: modify start-*.sh to change the "-classpath". Best, ---

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-148) modify start-*.sh to adapt the new jar files position

xiangdong Huang created IOTDB-148: - Summary: modify start-*.sh to adapt the new jar files position Key: IOTDB-148 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-148 Project: Apache IoTDB

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-147) Script to generate the releasing structure

xiangdong Huang created IOTDB-147: - Summary: Script to generate the releasing structure Key: IOTDB-147 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-147 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type:

Re: Cherry-picking without PR

Hi, > - if the change is very minor and committer feels its okay to do it in develop / master directly then he does it > - If change is major or important than we make a PR and ask for review I'd like another PR (and attached the related approved PR URL on the other branch), so that some other

[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'IoTDB Website [null] [55]'

BUILD-STABLE: Job 'IoTDB Website [null] [55]': Is back to normal.

Re: Cherry-picking without PR

Hi, I got no opinions yet but would like to get some before simply doing it (or forgetting it). Thanks! Julian Am 16.07.19, 10:20 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi, as I'm working through the rel/0.8 branch I observed Tests that failed for me. This is due to minor issues with

回覆: Binary Release of IoTDB

Hi, As a newbie to IoTDB, I also would like to participate in this discussion. I stand for the structure 4. It is clean enough for users recognize the structure soon. Best regards, Tsung-Han Tsai 寄件者: 李天安 寄件日期: 2019年7月19日 下午 02:52 收件者: dev@iotdb.apache.org

Re: Binary Release of IoTDB

Hi， I prefer structure 4 to other structures. + 1 for that. Best Regards, — Tianan Li School of Software, Tsinghua University 李天安 清华大学 软件学院 > 在 2019年7月19日，下午2:30，Jialin Qiao 写道： > > Hi, > > Nothing good comes easily :) > > After reorganizing the tools, deduplicating scripts

Re: Binary Release of IoTDB

Hi, Structure 4 looks cool, I shall stand for it. (I am not forced to say that.) Tian Jiang > 在 2019年7月19日，下午2:40，Julian Feinauer 写道： > > Hi, > > I like it but perhaps would rename bin to sbin or scripts. > But also fine with that. > > I think it's excellent that the community adopts more

AW: Binary Release of IoTDB

Hi, I like it but perhaps would rename bin to sbin or scripts. But also fine with that. I think it's excellent that the community adopts more and more to the apache way. Good job everyone! Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: Binary

Re: Binary Release of IoTDB

Hi, Nothing good comes easily :) After reorganizing the tools, deduplicating scripts and removing grafana related folders, structure 4 here comes: (Structure 4): . ├── LICENSE ├── NOTICE ├── RELEASE_NOTES │ ├── bin │ ├── start-client.bat │ ├── start-client.sh │ ├──