BUILD-UNSTABLE: Job 'IoTDB/IoTDB-Pipe/master [master] [247]':
Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/IoTDB/job/IoTDB-Pipe/job/master/247/;>IoTDB/IoTDB-Pipe/master
[master] [247]"
Hi all, as the result, we got
7 * +1 for `extreme`
2 * +1 for `extreme_value` or `ext_value`
1 * -1 for `ext`
Since `ext` is not very intuitive and `extreme_value` may be too long.
Therefore, we decided to use `extreme`.
Jiajun Liu 于2021年6月3日周四 下午12:44写道：
> +1 extreme_value
> +0 extreme
Just noticed I only replied to trevor and not to the list.
Guess the general opion is not in favor of "ext", but just for the sake
of completeness ;-)
Chris
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [Discussion] The aggregation function name of getting
extreme value
Date: Wed, 2 Jun
Hi,
I’m doing an optimization of the tsfile upgrading log in 0.12.1, which will be
available this afternoon.
By the way, should we merge the thrift upgrading PR[1] before 0.12.1 released?
Best,
Haonan Hou
[1] https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/3216
> On Jun 3, 2021, at 4:55 PM, Xiangdong
Hi,
Any ideas or tasks that must be merged?
If no, I will start the release process.
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Chao Wang 于2021年5月31日周一 上午11:15写道：
> Great new!
>
>
> Looking forward to the release of
