t;> 清华大学 软件学院
>>
>> > -原始邮件-
>> > 发件人: "Justin Mclean"
>> > 发送时间: 2020-08-03 11:15:01 (星期一)
>> > 收件人: dev
>> > 抄送:
>> > 主题: Re: [Discuss] [Vote] Apache IoTDB 0.10.1 (incubating) RC2 release
>> >
>> > Hi,
e/incubator-iotdb/pull/1591
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Jialin Qiao
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 乔嘉林
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
> > -原始邮件-
> > 发件人: "Justin Mclean"
> > 发送时间: 2020-08-03 11:15:01 (星期一)
> > 收件人: dev
> > 抄送:
> > 主题: R
https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/1591
Thanks,
--
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University
乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "Justin Mclean"
> 发送时间: 2020-08-03 11:15:01 (星期一)
> 收件人: dev
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: [Discuss] [Vote] Apache IoTDB 0.10.1
Hi,
Thanks for paying attention to this discussion.
> Should the IPMC consider a vote by a mentor who is an IPMC member to be
> a defacto +1 on the IPMC level? So if 3 mentors voted on the release
> vote, why even bring it to the IPMC?
Like this, my original intention is to accelerate the votin
Hi,
> Should the IPMC consider a vote by a mentor who is an IPMC member to be
> a defacto +1 on the IPMC level?
There is also an alternative voting method, which with the IPMC permission
basically skips the IPMC runs once a release is in good shape. It has as far as
I know has only been used o
Hi,
> Should the IPMC consider a vote by a mentor who is an IPMC member to be
> a defacto +1 on the IPMC level? So if 3 mentors voted on the release
> vote, why even bring it to the IPMC? Is there a veto with PPMC releases?
There are no vetos on releases but an important issue might be found by
Question for you Justin:
Should the IPMC consider a vote by a mentor who is an IPMC member to be
a defacto +1 on the IPMC level? So if 3 mentors voted on the release
vote, why even bring it to the IPMC? Is there a veto with PPMC releases?
On 8/2/2020 8:52 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Vot
Hi,
> Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval
> -- i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release,
> and there must be more positive than negative votes.
In short PPMC != PMC, but if 72 hours have passed then I’d put this release
candidate up
Hi Kevin,
Thanks.
Yes, we do not need mentors' vote here.
But, as we have to need IPMC's votes in general@, and all of our mentors
are also IPMCs,
I think if we can get some votes from you, then it makes the next step
easier...
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of
So I don't know that you need to wait. Per
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html, I think you have majority
approval.
Votes on Package Releases
Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval
-- i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release,
Hi,
We have got 12 +1 votes already.
I'd like to wait for another two days to hope more votes, (and to hope we
can get at least 3 votes from our mentors/IPMCs in this mailing list).
Then, I will begin to vote on the incubator@ mailing list.
Best,
---
Xiangdong H
Hi,
+1 from committer :)
I checked:
- Incubating in name (ok)
- Download links (ok)
- Signatures and hashes (ok)
- Compile from source(ok)
- LICENSE and NOTICE
Hi,
+1
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- Download links
- DISCLAIMER
- Compiling from source
- Start in Mac
- Run with following statements
set storage group to root.ldwtest;
CREATE TIMESERIES root.liudwtest.d1.s0 WITH DATATYPE=DOUBLE, ENCODING=PLAIN;
insert into root.liudwtest.d1(timestamp,
Hi all,
+1 from contributor
I checked the following operations on macOS 10.13.6 and jdk 1.8
The source release:
Incubating in name [ok]
Has DISCLAIMER [ok]
LICENSE and NOTICE [ok]
Signatures and hashes [ok]
Release candidates match with corresponding tags [ok]
No jar files [ok]
Check third pa
Hi all,
+1 from contributor
I checked the following operations on macOS 10.13.6 and jdk 1.8
The source release:
Incubating in name [ok]
Has DISCLAIMER [ok]
LICENSE and NOTICE [ok]
Signatures and hashes [ok]
Release candidates match with corresponding tags [ok]
No jar files [ok]
Check third pa
Hi,
+1 from committer
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- Download links
- Signatures and hashes
- DISCLAIMER
- Git tag
- ASF headers in all source files
- Compiling from source
- LICENSE and NOTICE
- Start in Mac
- Run with following statements
SET STORAGE GROUP TO root.turbine;
CREATE TIMESERI
(2,2);
insert into root.turbine.d1(timestamp,s0) values(3,3);
select * from root;
Best,
Tian Jiang
发送自 Windows 10 版邮件应用
发件人: runhus...@foxmail.com
发送时间: 2020年7月30日 14:53
收件人: dev
主题: Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.10.1 (incubating) RC2 release
Hi all,
+1 from contributor
I checked the following
t into root.turbine.d1(timestamp,s0) values(1,1);
>insert into root.turbine.d1(timestamp,s0) values(2,2);
>insert into root.turbine.d1(timestamp,s0) values(3,3);
>select * from root;
>
>
>
>
>Thanks!
>
>runhus...@foxmail.com
>
>
>From: Houliang Qi
>Date: 2020-0
School of Software, Tsinghua University
乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院
-原始邮件-
发件人: "Haonan Hou"
发送时间: 2020-07-29 17:46:45 (星期三)
收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org"
抄送:
主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.10.1 (incubating) RC2 release
Hi,
+1 from PPMC
The source release:
incubating in name [ok
大学 软件学院
-原始邮件-
发件人: "Haonan Hou"
发送时间: 2020-07-29 17:46:45 (星期三)
收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org"
抄送:
主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.10.1 (incubating) RC2 release
Hi,
+1 from PPMC
The source release:
incubating in name [ok]
apache headers [ok]
signatures and hashes
ot;
>
> Thanks,
> —
> Jialin Qiao
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 乔嘉林
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
>> -原始邮件-
>> 发件人: "Haonan Hou"
>> 发送时间: 2020-07-29 17:46:45 (星期三)
>> 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org"
>> 抄送:
Jialin Qiao
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 乔嘉林
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
> > -原始邮件-
> > 发件人: "Haonan Hou"
> > 发送时间: 2020-07-29 17:46:45 (星期三)
> > 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org"
> > 抄送:
> > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.10.1 (incubating) RC2 release
>
> Hi,
>
> +1 from PPMC
>
> The source release:
> incubating in name [ok]
> apache headers [ok]
> signatures and hashes [ok]
> DISCLAIMER [ok]
> LICENSE and NOTICE [ok]
> no jar fil
Hi,
+1 from PPMC
The source release:
incubating in name [ok]
apache headers [ok]
signatures and hashes [ok]
DISCLAIMER [ok]
LICENSE and NOTICE [ok]
no jar files [ok]
could compile from source: ./mvnw.sh clean install [ok]
The binary distribution:
version number in CLI [ok]
signatures and hashes
Hi all,
RC2 is coming.
This is a vote for releasing v0.10.1, which is a bug-fix version of v0.10.0.
You can get its main changes from [5].
Comparing with RC1, RC2 fixes the following issue:
- add README_ZH.md file into release.
- upgrade orc-core dependency for license compatibility
- remove o
25 matches
Mail list logo
