AW: [DISCUSS] use different docker image name for iotdb modules

2021-10-21 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hey, good that we have a discussion here. I am unemotional about the outcome and I see advantages and disadvantages for both (3 releases, 3 readmes, …) in the first scenario but all the points below in the other one. So its good to have many opinions here : ) Julian Von: gaoyang <453935...@qq

AW: [DISCUSS] use different docker image name for iotdb modules

2021-10-20 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hey, of course this works with docker compose. You just have to use the “command” option in the docker-compose yaml file (you can state that for each separate service). See e.g. here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40210067/how-to-use-command-in-docker-compose-yml Best J Von: Xiangdong H

AW: [DISCUSS] use different docker image name for iotdb modules

2021-10-20 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hey, I agree with it (and already stumbled upon it). Another alternative would be to have only one image containing data for all three modules and an entrypoint script which distinguishes what process would really start. So you would just do ``` docker run iotdb <-- regular docker run iotdb c