> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "Julian Feinauer"
> 发送时间: 2019-09-19 23:07:16 (星期四)
> 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org"
> 抄送:
> 主题: AW: Reminding of changes in RPC
>
> Totally agree. This should be considered a change not just
"dev@iotdb.apache.org"
> 抄送:
> 主题: AW: Reminding of changes in RPC
>
> Totally agree. This should be considered a change not just a fix and thus be
> in a version 0.9.x but not in 0.8.x
>
> Julian
>
> Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet
>
>
> ----
Totally agree. This should be considered a change not just a fix and thus be in
a version 0.9.x but not in 0.8.x
Julian
Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Betreff: Re: Reminding of changes in RPC
Von: 徐毅
An: dev@iotdb.apache.org
Cc:
Hi,
Change
Hi,
Change definitions in rpc.thrift should be careful.
For example, you have jdbc with 0.8.0 and iotdb with 0.8.1 whose rpc.thrit
are a little bit different. It is most likely that you cannot use jdbc with
0.8.0 to connect iotdb with 0.8.1 since they are not compatible. This may
Hi,
I have renamed some variable and struct names in RPC in PR [1]:
Rename TS_Status to TSStatus;
Rename TS_StatusType to TSStatusType;
Use TSStatus to replace TSRPCRsp. (Since it only contains TSStatus field)
If you are working on JDBC or session, please pull latest master code to avoid
more
