[jira] [Commented] (ISIS-1897) applib: the new ObjectContracts needs backward compatibility

2018-03-06 Thread Dan Haywood (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388013#comment-16388013 ] Dan Haywood commented on ISIS-1897: --- At a quick glance, looks good.  This info needs to g

[jira] [Updated] (ISIS-1635) Upgrade dependency to resteasy

2018-03-06 Thread Dan Haywood (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Haywood updated ISIS-1635: -- Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M1 > Upgrade dependency to resteasy > -- > >

Re: Current state on 2.0.0-M1

2018-03-06 Thread Andi Huber
Maven Build of 'master' source should work now! In case anybody is interested, I post a little script here [2], that builds from most recent sources using branch 'master' at github. Cheers Andi! [2] #!/bin/bash rm -r ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/isis rm master.zip rm -r isis-master wget https://

Re: Current state on 2.0.0-M1

2018-03-06 Thread Andi Huber
Thanks Jeroen! I can confirm that. Build fails due to missing dependencies. I'll try to fix this as fast as possible. At least this standard build you referenced [1] should work. Other than that, I've everything checked out in my IDE, where everything compiles and every JUnit Test passes. So the

Re: Current state on 2.0.0-M1

2018-03-06 Thread Jeroen van der Wal
Great stuff Andy! To maintain visibility to the community and keep the barrier for collaboration low I would prefer that you keep working in master. But a good feedback loop is important (I learned that from Dan) so we will allocate some time to have a publicly available CI and Docker images of th

Re: Current state on 2.0.0-M1

2018-03-06 Thread Andi Huber
Thx Dan. I think, I can live with that no problem. However, M1 has grown structural rather far apart from the 'stable' branch, so any changes made on the 'stable' branch need to be merged into 'M1' not the other way around. Also the idea of rebasing M1 on 'stable' is no longer applicable. (At lea

Re: Current state on 2.0.0-M1

2018-03-06 Thread Dan Haywood
Hi Andi, Thanks for this, and the update. To expand on your status update, right now we have two main branches of development: - the "maint-1.16.2" branch ... this is where I cut the 1.16.2 release from - the "master" branch, which holds the stuff intended for the 2.0.0-M1. Since "master" is cur

Current state on 2.0.0-M1

2018-03-06 Thread Andi Huber
The 'master' branch intended for version (2.0.0-M1) is progressing: We've broken apart our core modules such that its now in the responsibility of developers to pick from the new core-plugins, what they want to include with their domain-code and web-app deployment. Meaning for migration, domain-c