Re: Blank archetype

2013-02-12 Thread Dan Haywood
d is documentation of how to go about > >>> adding new components as you're working on your own project (adding a > >>> different objectstore, adding junit viewer, etc.) And since I want it I > >>> guess it falls on me to write it up :) > >>> &

Re: Blank archetype

2013-02-12 Thread Minto van der Sluis
is needed is documentation of how to go about >>> adding new components as you're working on your own project (adding a >>> different objectstore, adding junit viewer, etc.) And since I want it I >>> guess it falls on me to write it up :) >>> >>> On

Re: Blank archetype

2013-02-12 Thread Dan Haywood
u're working on your own project (adding a > > different objectstore, adding junit viewer, etc.) And since I want it I > > guess it falls on me to write it up :) > > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Dan Haywood < > d...@haywood-associates.co.uk>wrote:

Re: Blank archetype

2013-02-10 Thread Adam Howard
gt; On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Dan Haywood < > d...@haywood-associates.co.uk>wrote: > > > >> Hi Adam, > >> I have no problem with us also supporting such a blank archetype. > >> > >> Previously our archetypes was based on the claims example app, whic

Re: Blank archetype

2013-02-07 Thread Minto van der Sluis
it falls on me to write it up :) > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Dan Haywood > wrote: > >> Hi Adam, >> I have no problem with us also supporting such a blank archetype. >> >> Previously our archetypes was based on the claims example app, which was 3 >&g

Re: Blank archetype

2013-02-06 Thread Adam Howard
alls on me to write it up :) On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Dan Haywood wrote: > Hi Adam, > I have no problem with us also supporting such a blank archetype. > > Previously our archetypes was based on the claims example app, which was 3 > domain entities rather than just t

Re: Blank archetype

2013-02-05 Thread Dan Haywood
Hi Adam, I have no problem with us also supporting such a blank archetype. Previously our archetypes was based on the claims example app, which was 3 domain entities rather than just the one in the current wrj archetype... the reason being to make it quickly easy to get something going. My

Blank archetype

2013-02-05 Thread Adam Howard
Hello, I started a new Isis project by generating from the wrj quickstart archetype. I ran into two issues I'd like to bring up for discussion: 1. The archetype really specifies an application (ToDo) rather than a starting point for my own project. It is helpful that I can see many of the capabil