Re: Annotation based implementation of jackrabbit ocm

2007-07-03 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi all, Cool ! But: There is one important issue, though. Using annotations (out of the box) requires Java 5, while Jackrabbit is still AFAIK intended to the usable with Java 1.4. Thus we would have to carefully decided on whether and how to apply this patch to not loose 1.4 compatibility suppor

Promoting OCM from contrib

2007-07-03 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, As has recently been discussed, I'd like to promote the OCM component from contrib status to be released as a part of Jackrabbit 1.4. The component is seeing increasing levels of use, and making a formal release would make it easier for people to depend on the component in external projects.

Promoting SPI from contrib

2007-07-03 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, The SPI project is becoming more mature, and people are starting to use it for connector and other stuff. The full round-trip from JCR to SPI and back using the jcr2spi and spi2jcr components is also mostly finished, which means that it is quite easy to hook up various JCR stuff with the SPI.

Re: Promoting OCM from contrib

2007-07-03 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, First off, I am all for a promotion to the main stream. But then, I am somewhat reserved with respect to the Node Type Management stuff. This is - as the respective API is not defined in JCR - depending on the Jackrabbit-Core library. So as first step, I suggest investigating whether it is p

Re: Promoting SPI from contrib

2007-07-03 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, I agree to moved SPI to prime time, with one single exception: > At this point we could make jackrabbit-core depend on spi and > spi-commons for some of the generic functionality, even though we > wouldn't still use the RepositoryService or the other central > interfaces in jackrabbit-core.

Re: Promoting SPI from contrib

2007-07-03 Thread Stefan Guggisberg
On 7/3/07, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I agree to moved SPI to prime time, with one single exception: > At this point we could make jackrabbit-core depend on spi and > spi-commons for some of the generic functionality, even though we > wouldn't still use the RepositoryServi

[jira] Commented: (JCR-774) TCK: Test that expect that modifications made by Session1 are automatically visible to Session2

2007-07-03 Thread angela (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509851 ] angela commented on JCR-774: the same applies for - NodeCanAddMixinTest.testLocked > TCK: Test that expect that modificat

[jira] Updated: (JCR-774) TCK: Test that expect that modifications made by Session1 are automatically visible to Session2

2007-07-03 Thread angela (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] angela updated JCR-774: --- Attachment: NodeCanAddMixinTest.patch > TCK: Test that expect that modifications made by Session1 are automatically > v

[jira] Created: (JCR-999) SPI: provide batch read functionality

2007-07-03 Thread angela (JIRA)
SPI: provide batch read functionality - Key: JCR-999 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-999 Project: Jackrabbit Issue Type: New Feature Components: SPI Reporter: angela

[jira] Created: (JCR-1000) JCR2SPI: remove duplicate item states

2007-07-03 Thread angela (JIRA)
JCR2SPI: remove duplicate item states - Key: JCR-1000 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1000 Project: Jackrabbit Issue Type: Improvement Components: SPI Reporter: angela

Re: document order related questions

2007-07-03 Thread bilobag
Does anyone know how to order a collection of child nodes by a specific property from the getNodes() call? or do i have to manually order the nodes using java? Please let me know if you have any ideas. Is there a way to query just for a parents child nodes and put an order by clause in the query

Re: [jira] Created: (JCR-1000) JCR2SPI: remove duplicate item states

2007-07-03 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 7/3/07, angela (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: JCR2SPI: remove duplicate item states - Key: JCR-1000 Reporter: angela You have filed the 1000'th Jackrabbit issue, and will thus be rewarded by eternal fame in the issue tracker history. :-) BR, Jukk

Re: Promoting SPI from contrib

2007-07-03 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 7/3/07, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At this point we could make jackrabbit-core depend on spi and > spi-commons for some of the generic functionality, even though we > wouldn't still use the RepositoryService or the other central > interfaces in jackrabbit-core. If we

[jira] Resolved: (JCR-1000) JCR2SPI: remove duplicate item states

2007-07-03 Thread angela (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] angela resolved JCR-1000. - Resolution: Fixed fixed with rev. 552873 > JCR2SPI: remove duplicate item states > ---

[jira] Commented: (JCR-999) SPI: provide batch read functionality

2007-07-03 Thread angela (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509913 ] angela commented on JCR-999: initial changes for batch-read with rev. 552873 > SPI: provide batch read functionality >

[jira] Resolved: (JCR-851) Handling of binary properties (streams) in QValue interface

2007-07-03 Thread angela (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] angela resolved JCR-851. Resolution: Fixed applied patch with rev. 552909 and modified the QValueTest class accordingly > Handling of binary

[jira] Created: (JCR-1001) SPI: prefer 'Iterator' instead of specialized subclasses

2007-07-03 Thread angela (JIRA)
SPI: prefer 'Iterator' instead of specialized subclasses Key: JCR-1001 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1001 Project: Jackrabbit Issue Type: Improvement Compone

Re: Annotation based implementation of jackrabbit ocm

2007-07-03 Thread Carlos Sanchez
On 7/3/07, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, Cool ! But: There is one important issue, though. Using annotations (out of the box) requires Java 5, while Jackrabbit is still AFAIK intended to the usable with Java 1.4. Thus we would have to carefully decided on whether and how

Re: Promoting OCM from contrib

2007-07-03 Thread Christophe Lombart
I'm agree with Felix : 1/ Move the jcr-mapping & drop ref to jackrabbit-core 2/ Wait for the node management tools. Why not to keep it in the contrib areal until we found a solution ? 3/ The modification mades for Spring support can be contributed to the Spring module project. Christophe On 7/

Re: Annotation based implementation of jackrabbit ocm

2007-07-03 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, > this doesn't affect the rest of jackrabbit, if you want to use java > 1.4 with ocm you can use the digester implementation. Don't you have to compile it using targetVM=1.5 ? In that case you would not be able to use with 1.4 anymore due to the increased class file version. I would love to b

Re: Annotation based implementation of jackrabbit ocm

2007-07-03 Thread Carlos Sanchez
On 7/3/07, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > this doesn't affect the rest of jackrabbit, if you want to use java > 1.4 with ocm you can use the digester implementation. Don't you have to compile it using targetVM=1.5 ? In that case you would not be able to use with 1.4 anymore