[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559842#action_12559842
]
Felix Meschberger commented on JCR-1312:
> Jackrabbit is not an XML parser project.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tobias Bocanegra reopened JCR-1046:
---
apparently some tests fail:
CRAPITest
testMergeNodeNonVersionableSubNodeUpdate :
junit.framewo
ok, i will take a look at it more closely.
regards, toby
On 1/17/08, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I still need to fix the email notifications...
>
> Anyway, it seems like the JCR-1046 fix broke something.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> -- Forwarded message --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Micah Whitacre updated JCR-1318:
Attachment: JCR_1318-patch.txt
I created a patch based on the 1.3 branch of jackrabbit-core that isn'
Hi,
Yes, I still need to fix the email notifications...
Anyway, it seems like the JCR-1046 fix broke something.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 17, 0008 1:10 AM
Subject: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Jackrabbit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tobias Bocanegra updated JCR-1046:
--
Affects Version/s: 1.5
1.3.1
1.3.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tobias Bocanegra resolved JCR-1046.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5
fixed as proposed.
> Non-versionable children of a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Micah Whitacre updated JCR-1318:
Attachment: JCR_1318_tests.zip
Created a testcase which will demonstrate the behavior I'm talking abo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tobias Bocanegra reassigned JCR-1046:
-
Assignee: Tobias Bocanegra
> Non-versionable children of a versionable node should not be u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559687#action_12559687
]
Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCR-1046:
---
yes, i think your (latest) patch is correct. t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bob Wieler updated JCR-1046:
Attachment: jcr1046.diff
Updated patch.
> Non-versionable children of a versionable node should not be updat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559668#action_12559668
]
Bob Wieler commented on JCR-1046:
-
The fix I supplied for this should actually only merge non
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bob Wieler updated JCR-1046:
Attachment: (was: jcr1046.diff)
> Non-versionable children of a versionable node should not be updated wh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bob Wieler resolved JCR-1314.
-
Resolution: Invalid
You're right. This is an bug/inconsistency with the the specification. The
problem is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559659#action_12559659
]
hannonpi edited comment on JCR-872 at 1/16/08 1:12 PM:
-
Please dis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Padraic Hannon updated JCR-872:
---
Attachment: (was: observableCache.patch)
> Cache framework integration
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559659#action_12559659
]
Padraic Hannon commented on JCR-872:
Please disregard the patch I created. I messed up due
+1
On Jan 16, 2008 6:47 PM, Padraic Hannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The factory could also preload the mapping
> classes and other configuration items (like say the cache
> implementation factory?).
If I understand, there is 3 factories :
one for the ObjectcontentManager
one for the JCR se
Repository Home locked not released despite RepositoryException being thrown.
-
Key: JCR-1318
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1318
Project: Jackrabbit
While working with the caches and with our own internal content
mapping project I have noticed a slight disconnect between how OCM
handles sessions and how jackrabbit seems to want to handle them. With
the OCM one tends to have a long lived object content manager that is
potentially used by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559597#action_12559597
]
Padraic Hannon commented on JCR-872:
I'm working on ehcache now.
I probably was confusin
Hi,
My experience is that all XML parser are a little bit different. I
don't know about you, but I did run into quite many problems because
of XML parser incompatibilities. If we always use the same parser we
would be sure we always get the same result on all systems. I believe
that would be a big
excellent. congratulations to the whole team.
> I put Jukka's annoucement on Dzone to get some attention. Please vote
> for it:
cool. done ;)
regards,
david
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559547#action_12559547
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-1312:
Why doesn't kxml come with the DocumentBuilder imple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559541#action_12559541
]
Felix Meschberger commented on JCR-1312:
Performance: kXml is about twice as fast as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559541#action_12559541
]
fmeschbe edited comment on JCR-1312 at 1/16/08 7:41 AM:
-
Perf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559532#action_12559532
]
Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCR-1314:
---
i think the spec is wrong:
in 8.2.10 it says:
On Jan 14, 2008 6:28 PM, Padraic Hannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for me as well. I know that jackrabbit tends to stick to apache
> only libraries, however, if we could re-wire with Spring I think it
> would be pretty slick and since most people already use it extensively
> it wouldn't introd
Great!
I put Jukka's annoucement on Dzone to get some attention. Please vote
for it:
http://www.dzone.com/links/apache_jackrabbit_14_released.html
Unfortunately Dzone's having some server problems lately, so it might
be that the page is missing CSS and images...
Alex
Am 15.01.2008 um 22
Jo Størset wrote:
Is it possible to say anthing about the progress around this?
there is progress and the work has high priority. however,
i can't provide you any timeframe... i mean apart
from the obvious.
Since we need this kind of functionality, it would be nice to have some
basics in plac
Hi all,
This is my first Jackrabbit release. I would like to take the opportunity to
congratulate the Jackrabbit team for their work. Jackrabbit is a very nice
project. a BIG Thank also to all OCM committers & contributors. It was a
great help.
Best regards,
Christophe
On Jan 15, 2008 10:48 PM
Den 15. jan.. 2008 kl. 09.52 skrev Angela Schreiber:
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
* Node type management
Sorry, meant * Built-in access control
Based on this proposal? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1171
There hasn't been any more comments on that issue for a while.
i'm working on jsr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559452#action_12559452
]
angela commented on JCR-1310:
-
> Nice!
=> carsten => cocoon.
> Webdav: Drop xerces dependency
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger resolved JCR-1237.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5
I've changed the default for respectDocumentOrder t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559442#action_12559442
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-1310:
You mean NamespaceFixingContentHandler? Nice! It's s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559429#action_12559429
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-1312:
I still don't see why we should have the alternative
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559427#action_12559427
]
angela commented on JCR-1312:
-
felix, what you were saying was: there is a performance/memory pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559423#action_12559423
]
Felix Meschberger commented on JCR-1312:
Thanks for all the remarks. Just to get back
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manuel Duran updated JCR-1317:
--
Attachment: createWorkdpace.patch
A patch against 1.3.3 with a functional version of method
> Add a MBea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559418#action_12559418
]
Kris Kempa commented on JCR-872:
I fully agree with Ian:
+1 for Ehcache.
http://ehcache.sour
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559414#action_12559414
]
Ian Boston commented on JCR-1312:
-
Also agree and have some more recent evidence.
The be
Add a MBean method to programatically create a new Workspace.
-
Key: JCR-1317
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1317
Project: Jackrabbit
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559411#action_12559411
]
Ian Boston commented on JCR-872:
Sorry to interrupt
Please don't bind to Hibernate, if you do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559398#action_12559398
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-927:
---
Hi Guido,
if you believe that there are proble
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Mueller updated JCR-872:
---
Description:
OCM should work with a cache manager.
* The Spring frameworks offer a nice solution to int
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nimesh Muley updated JCR-1316:
--
Attachment: InheritedIDFieldDescriptor.patch
Patch to fix this issue.
> ID Field Descriptor is not inher
ID Field Descriptor is not inherited as is the case with UUID Field Descriptor
--
Key: JCR-1316
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1316
Project: Jackrabbit
Hi Paddy,
On Jan 15, 2008 10:29 PM, Padraic Hannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a simple OCM cache which I would like to remove or at least
> make optional. Currently there is already a lot of caching going on
> within jackrabbit and the current cache implementation for OCM is
> extremel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guido Jäkel updated JCR-927:
Attachment: jackrabbit.log
@Dominique:
May we please reopen this or re-new it with a new topic?
Using V1.4-R
49 matches
Mail list logo
