On Nov 5, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Angela Schreiber wrote:
hi alan
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Quite a handy servlet. Too bad it's in jackrabbit-server. Would
this not be better placed in jackrabbit-webdav? I'm writing my
own server bits under WEBDAV and would prefer not to have JCR/
Quite a handy servlet. Too bad it's in jackrabbit-server. Would
this not be better placed in jackrabbit-webdav? I'm writing my own
server bits under WEBDAV and would prefer not to have JCR/Jackrabbit
stuff. I realize that this is a fussy preference.
Regards,
Alan
things as interceptors at the moment. And most probably, there will
not
be such things on the PersistenceManager level unless you implement it
yourself. But I am not sure, whether this would be a good idea.
Regards
Felix
Am Freitag, den 31.08.2007, 10:57 -0700 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera:
Thoughts?
On Au
On Oct 19, 2007, at 11:33 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
Are file based blob stores inherently non-transactional or does one
just need to be written?
Just needs to be written.
I need one and am happy to try to write one. Do you have any
pointers before I embark on this endeavor?
Sorry, I
On Oct 2, 2007, at 4:41 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Are file based blob stores inherently non-transactional or does one
just need to be written?
Just needs to be written.
I need one and am happy to try to write one. Do you have any
pointers before I embark on this endeavor?
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 22, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Sep 22, 2007, at 3:32 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On 9/22/07, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 20, 2007, at 12:34 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Yes, using RMI does make a difference. Is RMI required in your
On Sep 22, 2007, at 3:32 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On 9/22/07, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 20, 2007, at 12:34 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Yes, using RMI does make a difference. Is RMI required in your case?
Because not using it would be another speed up.
On Sep 20, 2007, at 12:34 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
No particular reason. I didn't know that the others were better.
What are the differences between the three?
I have updated the PersistenceManagerFAQ in the Wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/PersistenceManagerFAQ
The informatio
On Sep 17, 2007, at 7:33 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I think the ObjectPersistenceManager should not be used. Maybe it is
time to deprecate it... Is there some specific reason why you can't
use a more modern persistence manager, for example
BundleFsPersistenceManager or BundleDbPersistenceMa
I'm using JackRabbit v1.3.1 with the ObjectPersistenceManager. I
noticed that after a large number of binary inserts, about one
million, that inserting takes over three times as long. When I
restart the server it becomes much more lively. I notice that the
info from the CacheManager durin
Thoughts?
On Aug 28, 2007, at 9:16 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 27, 2007, at 11:16 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
Yes, in my view, repository.xml and workspace.xml should go away
or at
least be less visible for a user. Or do you mean something else with
XML configuration?
I don&#
On Aug 27, 2007, at 11:16 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
Yes, in my view, repository.xml and workspace.xml should go away or at
least be less visible for a user. Or do you mean something else with
XML configuration?
I don't see why we would want to make configuration files less
visible to t
There seems to be a tight coupling to XML configurations. This makes
it a bit hard for me to make extensions. IMO, we would have
factories. What are other people's thoughts and are there plans to
change this?
Also, I was thinking that it would be neat to have interceptor
stacks. wdyt?
On Aug 27, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
Do you have your own PersistenceManager implementation?
Yes.
Regards,
Alan
I need to have a node whereby there are some read-only properties
that get filled in by the persistence manager. This particular node
type will always have these read-only attributes which are just
strings. Any advice as to how I should declare these special R/O
properties?
Regards,
A
On Aug 23, 2007, at 5:49 PM, Padraic I. Hannon wrote:
However, you will probably run into search and retrieval issues? I
am unsure as to the guts of the lucene part of the application, but
there may be problems there with so many files?
Yeah, I was thinking that a ton of relatively little,
I need a JCR that has infinite capacity. This is for a photo
repository that would store millions of 5-10MB photos. The photos
themselves would not change. I need to be able to add
One idea that I've been toying with is to create a persistence
manager that manages multiple stores. Some
17 matches
Mail list logo
