successfully verified hashes and signature
successfully built from source
successfully ran tests
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.2.0
cheers
stefan
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 9:29 AM Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
>
> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.2.0 release is
all checks ok
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault Package Maven
Plugin 1.0.1
cheers
stefan
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
> Hi alter ego,
>
> [INFO] Apache Maven 3.5.0 (ff8f5e7444045639af65f6095c62210b5713f426;
>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> On 16/01/17 08:36, Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
>>
>> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.34 release is available at:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.1.34/
>
>
> I have
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.28.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.28
> [ ] -1 Do not release this
- verified PGP signature and sha1 checksum
- ran 'mvn install' without errors
[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.20
cheers
stefan
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.20 release is
hi francesco,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Francesco Mari
mari.france...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
since I don't have access to the wiki, I started to write down a draft
for the remote API in a public GitHub repository [1].
I didn't write much so far, but I invite every interested party
Stefan Guggisberg stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Francesco Mari
mari.france...@gmail.com wrote:
Should the API expose every authentication strategy implemented in
Oak?
which strategy should be supported by the remoting layer is something
that needs TBD.
i'd say we
+1
btw: there seems to be a bug in AdminPermissionCheckerTest. this test
fails when running the tests twice, e.g.
mvn clean install
mvn test
see attached stack trace.
cheers
stefan
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit
hi adrien,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Adrien Lamoureux
lamoureux.adr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
No one has responded to the issues I'm having with the MicroKernel.
sorry, missed that one.
the problem you're having ('str:' being prepended to ':blobid:...')
seems to be caused by a bug
in
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
I also tried including MongoMK results, but the benchmark got stuck in
ConcurrentReadTest. I'll re-try today and will file a bug if I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3239:
---
Priority: Major (was: Minor)
Removal of a top level node doesn't update the hierarchy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3770:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.7.6
refine validateHierarchy check in order to avoid false-positives
Stefan Guggisberg created JCR-3770:
--
Summary: refine validateHierarchy check in order to avoid
false-positives
Key: JCR-3770
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3770
Project: Jackrabbit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13969585#comment-13969585
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-3770:
JCR-2598 introduced the optional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved JCR-3770.
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in svn revision 1587619
refine validateHierarchy check in order
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.0
cheers
stefan
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.1.0/
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Do we still need the oak-mk-perf component for something? We added it
in OAK-335, but have since implemented a much more comprehensive set
of benchmarks in oak-run.
It doesn't seem as if the code is still
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:57 PM, julian.resc...@gmx.de
julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2013-11-21 10:55, ste...@apache.org wrote:
...
Modified:
jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
URL:
hi tommaso
the javadoc of org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.api.MicroKernel specifies the
API contract.
org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.test.MicroKernelIT is the integration test
which verifies
whether an implementation obeys the contract.
org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.core.MicroKernelImpl serves as a reference
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
SNNP was introduced with JSR 283, mainly due to pressure from vendors with
legacy systems. we (day) were opposed since SNNP
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote:
I would rather keep the support for same name properties and nodes in
order to ensure backward compatibility for existing repositories.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote:
I don't know anymore where I heard/read this, but I had the
assumption, that oak will no longer support properties and child nodes
hi ate,
thanks, i'll have a look.
cheers
stefan
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
I didn't see yet any feedback on this [1].
Its not like a very critical bug (probably) but still serious enough IMO
to consider fixing.
Anyone interested to at least take a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg reassigned JCR-3581:
--
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
Incorrect bitwise arithmetic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved JCR-3581.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.7
2.6.1
committed patch in svn
i committed your patch, thanks!
cheers
stefan
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
hi ate,
thanks, i'll have a look.
cheers
stefan
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
I didn't see yet any feedback
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3581:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.4.4
Incorrect bitwise arithmetic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3568:
---
Component/s: (was: jackrabbit-api)
jackrabbit-webdav
Priority
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved JCR-3568.
Resolution: Invalid
Property.getBinary().getStream() files in tempDir not removed
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've now spent a few days drafting some initial implementation code to
see how such a design would work in practice.
Fast forward
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Alex Parvulescu
alex.parvule...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
For OAK-624 I needed to compare the test run times between 2 different mk
implementations so I came up with a script that computes the percentage
difference between the 2 'mvn test' runs.
This allows for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg reassigned JCR-3514:
--
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
Error in RepositoryImpl class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13576704#comment-13576704
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-3514:
bq. The condition should rather
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved JCR-3514.
Resolution: Not A Problem
Error in RepositoryImpl class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3509:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Workspace maxIdleTime parameter not working
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13576708#comment-13576708
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-3509:
bq. It should rather be if (!initialized
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3502:
---
Component/s: clustering
Deleted states are not merged correctly
cheers
stefan
-Mete
On 1/7/13 5:11 PM, Stefan Guggisberg stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Marcel Reutegger mreut...@adobe.com
wrote:
Hi,
while working on OAK-535 I noticed that MongoMK.getHeadRevision()
may also return the revision of a branch commit
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Currently the Microkernel contract does not specify a merge policy but is
free to try to merge conflicting changes or throw an exception. I think this
is problematic in various ways:
1) Automatic merging may
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
This is a bit more complicated. In fact it is the other way around: if two
journal entries commute, the corresponding differences on the nodes due not
conflict regarding the definition I gave.
OTOH non conflicting
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Michael Dürig mic...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18.12.12 11:30, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Currently the Microkernel contract does not specify a merge policy but is
free to try to merge
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
On 18.12.12 16:05, Mete Atamel wrote:
In MongoMK, getJournal basically returns the jsonDiff from the commit, at
least in the simple case when there is no path to filter.
And AFAIK this is the same for the H2 MK.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13507249#comment-13507249
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-3452:
bq. Yes, that is correct. BUT, adding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3452:
---
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
Modified property and child node definition
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13507346#comment-13507346
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-3452:
bq. What about the change of property
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved JCR-3452.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.6
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3452:
---
Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement)
Modified property and child node definition
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Jan Haderka
jan.hade...@magnolia-cms.com wrote:
Hiya,
there appears to be fair number of issues in JR that were fixed by
unassigned. Is this on purpose?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13506599#comment-13506599
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-3452:
bq. AFAIU, making something more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg reassigned JCR-3468:
--
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
ConcurrentModificationException in BitSetENTCacheImpl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved JCR-3468.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.6
fixed in svn r1414733
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
- do you have a proposal for the suggested
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
- returning an :id and/or :hash should be optional, i.e. we shouldn't
require an implementation to return an :id or :hash
hi jukka
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
A lot of functionality in Oak (node states, the diff and hook
mechanisms, etc.) are based on walking down the tree hierarchy one
level at a time. To do this, for example to access changes below
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This came up earlier in the Berlin Oakathon and we're now facing it
also with the property index. Basically, do we want to add explicit
support for long ( 1k values) multivalued properties?
Currently such
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Mete Atamel mata...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
On 11/6/12 9:24 AM, Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com wrote:
Yes. Somebody has to decide which revisions are no longer needed. Luckily
it doesn't need to be us :-) We might set a default value (10 minutes or
so), and then
hi,
sorry, wrong list.
i guess you're using this project:
http://code.google.com/p/jackrabbitexplorer/
please send your questions to their mailing list.
cheers
stefan
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:56 AM, nadhiya
nadhiya.shanm...@icissolutions.com wrote:
hi,
I use glassfish server and have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13486897#comment-13486897
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-3453:
FWIW:
bq. * Actually why do you need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13486993#comment-13486993
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-3453:
bq. Actually I'm ready to contribute
or
separate issues, not sure.
excellent, i'll check.
thanks
stefan
-Mete
[0]
https://github.com/meteatamel/jackrabbit-oak/blob/6b4635edc5908f346f5bc0e35
4cf2563d6aa6da7/oak-mongomk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mongomk/imp
l/MongoMKBranchMergeTest.java
On 10/25/12 3:55 PM, Stefan
]
https://github.com/meteatamel/jackrabbit-oak/blob/6b4635edc5908f346f5bc0e35
4cf2563d6aa6da7/oak-mongomk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mongomk/imp
l/MongoMKBranchMergeTest.java
On 10/25/12 3:55 PM, Stefan Guggisberg stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:38 PM
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Mete Atamel mata...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
I think I found a bug with branch/merge in MicroKernelImpl but wanted to
make sure. The last assert in the test fails. Could someone verify that
this is indeed a bug?
thanks, i'll have a look.
cheers
stefan
@Test
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As you may have noticed from my work in OAK-352, we now have pretty
clean and simple mechanism for constructing repositories with
different combinations of pluggable components. Here's a quick guide
on how to
:49, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
i agree that the ambiguity of '^' vs '+' is confusing. personally i'd
prefer
to get rid of the '+' syntax for property creation altogether. as a
consequence we'd loose the ability to generate PROPERTY_ADDED events
from the mk journal. i don't know whether that's
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
I wonder why the Microkernel API has an asymmetry here: for writing a binary
you can pass a stream where as for reading you need to pass a byte array.
the write method implies a content-addressable storage for blobs,
hi mete
i'm copying the oak-dev list since this might be of interest to others.
comments follow inline...
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Mete Atamel mata...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi Stefan,
One thing that I've been wanting to ask you is the distinction between
StagedNode vs. StoredNode. I see
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Mete Atamel mata...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 questions on MicroKernel add/set property that MicroKernel
JavaDoc does not seem to answer.
1- What's the difference between adding a property vs. setting a property?
Are the two following commits basically
of the '+' syntax for property creation altogether. as a
consequence we'd loose the ability to generate PROPERTY_ADDED events
from the mk journal. i don't know whether that's a problem for the
current oak-core implementation.
opinions?
cheers
stefan
-Mete
On 10/17/12 2:58 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
On 17.10.12 15:49, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
i agree that the ambiguity of '^' vs '+' is confusing. personally i'd
prefer
to get rid of the '+' syntax for property creation altogether. as a
consequence we'd loose
+1 to the Bertrand's suggestion same project name, different software name
cheers
stefan
On 28.09.2012, at 11:05, Mete Atamel mata...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a question with JSOP diff syntax. Say I want to add a node a with
a property and value. This is the diff I use in the commit:
diff.append(+\a\ : {\prop\ : \value\});
Is it legal to add a and then add its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13452802#comment-13452802
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-3424:
FWIW, here are the relevant log entries
hi marcel
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Marcel Reutegger mreut...@adobe.com wrote:
hi all,
while looking through the oak code and also in light of the
recent MongoDB based MicroKernel, I was wondering where
the process boundaries are. right now with the maven build
everything runs in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13440422#comment-13440422
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-267:
---
while i still can't explain how a private
Stefan Guggisberg created OAK-272:
-
Summary: every session login causes a mk.branch operation
Key: OAK-272
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-272
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13438508#comment-13438508
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-11:
--
+1 for julian's proposal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13438550#comment-13438550
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-11:
--
bq. getLength method is kind of vague too
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-264.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.5
good point!
fixed in svn r1375476
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg reassigned OAK-265:
-
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
waitForCommit gets triggered on private branch commits
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-254.
---
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in svn r1374228
waitForCommit returns null in certain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-239.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.5
fixed in svn r1372850
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-227:
--
Description:
a depth parameter allows to specify how deep changes should be included
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-227.
---
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in svn r1369019
MicroKernel API: add depth parameter
nice!
+1 for #2
cheers
stefan
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We had a chance to ask a real designer (instead of just me and my two
left eyes) take a look at improving the design of the Oak website. He
came up with screenshots of two
Stefan Guggisberg created OAK-227:
-
Summary: add depth parameter to MicroKernel#diff method
Key: OAK-227
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-227
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-227:
--
Summary: MicroKernel API: add depth parameter to diff method (was: add
depth parameter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-77:
-
Component/s: (was: mk)
removing mk component, there are IMO no redundant utility classes anymore
Stefan Guggisberg created OAK-210:
-
Summary: granularity of persisted data
Key: OAK-210
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-210
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg reassigned OAK-210:
-
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
granularity of persisted data
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13423864#comment-13423864
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-210:
---
bq. Do you see this as something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-210:
--
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
granularity of persisted data
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg reopened JCR-3246:
reopening based on nick's comment/analysis
(thanks, nick!)
RepositoryImpl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3246:
---
Component/s: (was: jackrabbit-core)
security
Priority: Minor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3246:
---
Attachment: JCR-3246.patch
proposed patch
UserManagerImpl attempts to close
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
implementing the transient space in Oak-Core is
legitimate, although premature optimization for
the specific use case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13417069#comment-13417069
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-3368:
It seems that the special handling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3173:
---
Component/s: versioning
transactions
InvalidItemStateException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3379:
---
Component/s: versioning
transactions
XA concurrent transactions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13410324#comment-13410324
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-169:
---
FWIW: here's the relevant discussion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13410364#comment-13410364
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-169:
---
bq. There is currently no statement about
1 - 100 of 1277 matches
Mail list logo