this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Clustering-w--distributed-cache-tp22044598p22044598.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
You are right, we have to serialize/deserialize objects. But that's the
price we have to pay for the clustering, is it?
The problem is not only serialization, you also have to send the objects
over TCP/IP (if I understand you idea correctly). Each operation (including
Node.getProperty,
).
Is the proposal feasible? Any comment is highly appreciated!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Clustering-w--distributed-cache-tp22044598p22044598.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
).
Is the proposal feasible? Any comment is highly appreciated!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Clustering-w--distributed-cache-tp22044598p22044598.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Clustering-w--distributed-cache-tp22044598p22044598.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.