Hi,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who's been participating in writing up the
> proposal; I think it's soon ready to be voted on! See [1] for the
> current status.
>
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChemistryProposal
I just filled in the last TO
Hi Jukka,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> In general I'd restrict the set of initial committers to people who've
> already been contributing to the initial codebases or the related
> discussions.
Thanks for this clarification. I agree with your valuable suggestion.
Engage
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Gianugo Rabellino
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> * We now only have volunteer mentors from Day. The normal diversity
>> rules don't really apply to mentors, but it would still be good to
>> have someone with a different
Hi,
I downloaded a word list from http://wordlist.sourceforge.net and ran:
grep -i -R --include=* -E 'c.?m.?i.?s' .
grep -i -R --include=* 'c.*m.*i[^s]*s' .
This got me a long list, including:
chromis
cinematics
combfish
comics
commissar
crimison
blackmails
buckminster
occamist (from Occam's raz
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> * We now only have volunteer mentors from Day. The normal diversity
> rules don't really apply to mentors, but it would still be good to
> have someone with a different perspective join us as a mentor. Note
> that you need to be an Apache m
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Serge Huber wrote:
But I would miss the current name, as I agree it is good :)
Me too. How about if we just slightly modified it, say to "Apache
Chemi" or something similar?
"Chemist"
BR, Julian (helping to paint the bikeshed :-))
or "Chemis" ?
Regards,
Serge Huber.
On 21 avr. 09, at 16:43, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Serge Huber
wrote:
But I would miss the current name, as I agree it is good :)
Me too. How about if we just slightly modified it, say to "Apache
Chemi" or something
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Serge Huber wrote:
> But I would miss the current name, as I agree it is good :)
Me too. How about if we just slightly modified it, say to "Apache
Chemi" or something similar?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Thank you Torgeir, I remember this being mentioned a while ago, but I
was mostly hoping to help if need be.
But I would miss the current name, as I agree it is good :)
Regards,
Serge Huber.
On 21 avr. 09, at 16:36, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
It is a play on the letters; CheMIStry.
2009/4/22
It is a play on the letters; CheMIStry.
2009/4/22 Serge Huber
>
> I might be jumping the gun a little, but if this can help, here are a few
> name suggestions :
>
> Apache Plug
> Apache Content Plug
> Apache Jackplug
> Apache Sea Miss (ok it's an awful word game :)) (or could be written
> Seamis
I might be jumping the gun a little, but if this can help, here are a
few name suggestions :
Apache Plug
Apache Content Plug
Apache Jackplug
Apache Sea Miss (ok it's an awful word game :)) (or could be written
Seamis, or Seemis)
Apache Startle (Jackrabbit synonym)
But I must admit the nam
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> I'll now ping the gene...@incubator.apache.org list for some early
> comments on the proposal.
See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/21727
for the Incubator thread.
There are some concerns over the name "Chem
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Serge Huber wrote:
> I am very interested in this project also, but I think it would be much too
> early for me to get commitership on this, as I need to first "prove" myself
> again, as an alumni of Jackrabbit :)
Cool, you're welcome to join as a contributor
I am very interested in this project also, but I think it would be
much too early for me to get commitership on this, as I need to first
"prove" myself again, as an alumni of Jackrabbit :)
Regards,
Serge
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> * Anyone else interested in joining as an initial committer?
> Dominique? It's of course possible to join also later, but then we'll
> need to go through the standard from-patches-to-committership process.
Oops, sorry for being late! I
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> So, I've created a skeleton proposal [1] for "Apache Chemistry", a
> project that would be based on the Chemistry code developed at Nuxeo
> and the JCR-CMIS code in the Jackrabbit sandbox. Feel free to edit the
> proposal and mark yourse
Hi Jukka,
Thanks alot.
I just added my name to the list of nominated mentors.
Regards
Felix
Jukka Zitting schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Our original plan for the CMIS efforts was to manage them as organic
> growth within Jackrabbit, essentially developing the code in the
> Jackrabbit sandbox and inviting
On 16 Apr 2009, at 15:38, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Our original plan for the CMIS efforts was to manage them as organic
growth within Jackrabbit, essentially developing the code in the
Jackrabbit sandbox and inviting CMIS contributors as Jackrabbit
committers based on their contributions.
However, i
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> However, it seems that with quite a bit of interest around this and
> with the codebase and potential committers having just a little
> overlap with Jackrabbit core, it might be better to take the effort to
> the Apache Incubator where t
Hi,
Our original plan for the CMIS efforts was to manage them as organic
growth within Jackrabbit, essentially developing the code in the
Jackrabbit sandbox and inviting CMIS contributors as Jackrabbit
committers based on their contributions.
However, it seems that with quite a bit of interest ar
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>> ...On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Marcel Reutegger
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the sources contain a copy right notice in the license header.
>>> wouldn't it be easier to have that in a notice file and instead use
>>> the standard apach
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>>> Definitely, as soon as the code is part of Jackrabbit (which is the time
>>> it is stored in the SVN) it belongs to the ASF and nobody but the ASF
>>> holds the copyright. As a consequence I would even go as far as say,
>>> this line m
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> PS. We also discussed introducing a "sandbox committer" concept for
>> cases like this with a lower entry bar than standard committership,
>> but we didn't reach consensu
Hi,
Alexander Klimetschek schrieb:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Marcel Reutegger
>>> wrote:
Hi,
the sources contain a copy right notice in the license header.
wouldn't it be easier to have that in a notice fi
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Florent Guillaume wrote:
>> Jukka Zitting wrote:
>>> Florent, would you and/or Nuxeo (depending on copyright ownership) be
>>> willing to submit a software grant
>>> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/s
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Florent, would you and/or Nuxeo (depending on copyright ownership) be
>> willing to submit a software grant
>> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt) covering the
>> Chemistry codebase?
>
> I sent
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Marcel Reutegger
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the sources contain a copy right notice in the license header.
>>> wouldn't it be easier to have that in a notice file and instead use
>>> the standard apache l
Hi,
Dominique Pfister schrieb:
> I wanted to check in the sources unchanged as I downloaded them before
> starting to adjust the license header, do refactorings, etc.
>
> Are you sure that @author tags in javadoc are not allowed in the
> sandbox as well? I see a lot of code in the sandbox that st
Hi,
I wanted to check in the sources unchanged as I downloaded them before
starting to adjust the license header, do refactorings, etc.
Are you sure that @author tags in javadoc are not allowed in the
sandbox as well? I see a lot of code in the sandbox that still
contains them...
Regards
Dominiq
Hi,
the sources contain a copy right notice in the license header.
wouldn't it be easier to have that in a notice file and instead use
the standard apache license header? there are also @author tags in
javadoc, which is contrary to our policy...
regards
marcel
2009/4/15 Jukka Zitting :
> Hi,
>
Jukka Zitting wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:49 PM, wrote:
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765129&view=rev
> Log:
> Initial checkin of chemistry
We should have a paper trail for any codebases we import. The size of
the Chemistry codebase suggests that we should even follow the full
Hm,
I did not consider this being a necessity. Florent involved the dev
list from the beginning of his development efforts and developed in an
open and transparent fashion. So he followed the Apache development
style and the reason for his code not being contributed in bits and
pieces is just admi
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:49 PM, wrote:
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765129&view=rev
> Log:
> Initial checkin of chemistry
We should have a paper trail for any codebases we import. The size of
the Chemistry codebase suggests that we should even follow the full IP
clearance proce
33 matches
Mail list logo
