Hi,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, this doesn't mean that we're going to implement everything at
once. Instead, once we have better consensus on what can and should be
done on the various ideas, I'd like to build an incremental roadmap
from
Hi,
Thanks for all the responses to the repository requirements thread
(keep 'em coming)! That's very valuable information when we start
looking deeper at the architectural changes and tradeoffs ahead of us.
The main concepts of the current Jackrabbit 1.x/2x. architecture date
back to almost a
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] Now that we're done implementing the new features and
changes for JCR 2.0, it's a good time to discuss what we can and
should make to modernize the Jackrabbit architecture.
BTW, this doesn't mean that
Jukka-
Just to clarify, you're talking about Jackrabbit 3, not JCR 3, right?
Thanks,
Justin
On 2/17/10 10:11 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for all the responses to the repository requirements thread
(keep 'em coming)! That's very valuable information when we start
looking deeper at
