Re: Gump nags

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all, > > Gump nag mails need to be adjusted so they go to the new list(s) rather > than get re-routed.  Do people prefer to have the nag mails go to the > notifications@ list or to d...@? > Thanks, was about to send a similar email :-)

Re: Gump nags

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-04-22, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >>> Hi all, > >>> Gump nag mails need to be adjusted so they go to the new list(s) rather >>> tha

Re: remove

To unsubscribe from the notifications list, send email to notifications-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org and reply to the confirmation email. For background, see: http://markmail.org/message/wvtswrmd3gwec7bq -Rahul On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Fergal Glynn wrote: > Please remove > > -

[INFO] Mailing list details, how to unsubscribe etc.

For information specific to this list, including posting guidelines, email subject conventions, and the email address to use to unsubscribe, please see: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#Development

Re: Hmm, filterable subject tag ?

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Hi there, > > wasn't there a plan to add the tag of the original list to the subject > line, such that one can use the mailing program for filtering, allowing > one to ignore those postings for projects that one is not interested in? >

Re: Gump nags

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-04-22, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > >> Do we have a Bugzilla admin on this list? Atleast the following use >> Bugzilla and would need to be updated: > >>   BCEL, BSF, JMeter, ORO, Regexp > > If notific

Re: [admin] Reply-To Header for notifications List

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > I just saw the notifications list was pointing to itself in the Reply-To > header.  For the other projects I know with a separate notifications > list this header points to the dev list so discussions will be more > visible right fro

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49174] Can't load response data from a listener if double byte includes in data

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Tim Cronin wrote: > I am not the assignee I don't even use jmeter... > For background, see: http://markmail.org/message/wvtswrmd3gwec7bq For list info, including the email address to use to unsubscribe, see: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#Devel

Re: Gump nags

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2010-04-22, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> >>> Do we have a Bugzilla admin on this list? Atleast the following use >>> Bugzilla and would need to be up

Re: [admin] Reply-To Header for notifications List

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just saw the notifications list was pointing to itself in the Reply-To >> header.  For the other projects I know with a separate notifications

Re: one list to rule them all (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49111] "Message With ID Not Found")

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote: > Frankly speaking I am not sure this "one list for all projects" is > working out too well for me here. > Mostly because of jira/bugzilla - but still. > Bugzilla needs to be sorted out better. Currently, new issues will get notifications@ a

Re: one list to rule them all (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49111] "Message With ID Not Found")

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Thomas, Boby wrote: > Can you please remove my id from this distribution. > > boby.tho...@capgemini.com > See the following link for the email address to use to unsubscribe: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#Development Similarly, for the notificatio

Re: one list to rule them all (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49111]"Message With ID Not Found")

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Thomas, Boby wrote: > Me too never subscribed for it and receiving too many mails. > > Who is the moderator or admin for this? Please take a look at the > distribution list this being sent out and remove me and whoever not opted for > it at the earliest. Thanks

Re: one list to rule them all (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49111] "Message With ID Not Found")

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote: >> Modulo the above, this isn't any different from say, Commons, where >> you are also active? > > If the above is solved it might be OK. > I have emailed infra about redirecting existing Bugzilla issues related notifications. I have added a

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49174] Can't load response data from a listener if double byte includes in data

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Bill Sewell wrote: > How do I get off this list? > Use the email addresses for unsubscribing as listed here and reply to confirmation emails: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#Development http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#Notifications -Rah

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49174] Can't load response data from a listener if double byte includes in data

v > 865-574-0119 > http://daac.ornl.gov > > > -Original Message- > From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:rahul.akol...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 1:06 PM > To: dev@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49174] Can't load response data from a

Re: [Cactus] Hudson notifications (was: Build failed in Hudson: Cactus #456)

Can the person(s) who set up the Hudson build for Cactus redirect these notifications to the notificati...@jakarta list? Thanks in advance, -Rahul On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote: > See > > -

Re: [BCEL] Potential licensing issue with GSoC contribution of Java 5 support

On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > As you may be aware, Apache Tomcat is using a packaged renamed copy of > BCEL to implement the annotation scanning neccessary for the Servlet 3.0 > implementation. As part of a recent release review, concerns were raised > over two files that or

Re: [BCEL] Potential licensing issue with GSoC contribution of Java 5 support

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On May 3, 2010, at 5:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >> Kevan works for IBM and has offered to help out in resolving this issue. >> I think it is time for me to pass the baton on this one to Kevan. > > I've created Bug 49259 and attached AL2 li

Re: Release BSF 3.1 ?

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:42 PM, sebb wrote: > There have been a few changes to the BSF 3.x code line since 3.0. > > I think it would be good to release version 3.1 along with its Maven version. > > I've asked for Nexus access for BSF 3.x, so I propose to use that for > staging/voting on the Mave

Re: Prices go down for jakarta-poi-cvs!

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > I thought no amount of drugs could help it - shouldn't jakarta-poi-cvs be > long dead by now? > I don't have the original (guessing it may have hit the spam folder which I emptied). From the archives, it looks like the From header is ja

Re: Prices go down for jakarta-poi-cvs!

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Vadim Gritsenko > wrote: >> I thought no amount of drugs could help it - shouldn't jakarta-poi-cvs be >> long dead by now? >> > > > I don't have the origina

Re: Prices go down for jakarta-poi-cvs!

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > On May 29, 2010, at 8:43 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Rahul Akolkar >> wrote: >>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Vadim Gritsenko >>> wrote: >>>

Re: svn commit: r951636 - /jakarta/bsf/branches/bsf3.x/bsf-engines/build.xml

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Juergen Pill wrote: > Hello sebb, > > I am flooded with tons of Jakarta e-mails, but do not know hpow to > unsubscribe to all of those lists. It seems an accident that I was enforced > added to those list. > In particular I do not know the e-mail address, that I

Re: Release BSF 3.1 (based on RC3)

Added [VOTE] prefix to subject to make sure its understood there is an ongoing vote in this thread. -Rahul On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, sebb wrote: > [Third time lucky?] > > Please review and vote on the BSF 3.1 release. > > The artifacts are available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~seb

Making some wikis read-only (was: [Jakarta-slide Wiki] Update of ...)

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all, > > I've deleted the page and wonder whether we should ask infra to make the > Slide Wiki read-only since it isn't maintained anyway. > Yes, +1 to making wikis of TLP'ed or attic'ed subprojects read-only. That would include: * Ja

Getting enough votes (was Re: Update of "JakartaBoardReport-current" ...)

Moved to dev@ ... On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Apache Wiki wrote: > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta Wiki" for > change notification. > > The "JakartaBoardReport-current" page has been changed by SebastianBazley. > http://wiki.apache.org/jak

Re: New home for ECS, ORO and Regexp?

ttic - don't worry about the > infrastructure move part, it's a well defined process now and someone > will take care of it. > > Hen > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Rahul Akolkar > wrote: >> This is cross-posted, please use your discretion to respond to the >&g

Re: [JMeter] changes to src code

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Franco _ wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm new to this so I'm sorry if this is not the way to approach this. > > The thing is I've made some changes to the JMeter source code to add a > functionality to how the threads behave when an error happens and I would > like t

Re: New home for ECS, ORO and Regexp?

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: > > In message , > Rahul > Akolkar writes: >>Daniel (or anyone else) - Should we check if there is interest at >>Commons in taking ORO? > > I'm reluctant to encourage additional expenditure of effor

[VOTE][LAZY] Move ECS, ORO and Regexp to Attic

This is a vote (or more correctly, three independent votes) to move Jakarta ECS, Jakarta ORO and Jakarta Regexp to the Apache Attic, based on the outcome of the most recent discussion on the topic. Since none of these subprojects may have enough PMC members active, this vote will be held by lazy c

Gump nags, from address

Like Commons now does for the new gump builds, I suggest we change the from address for all Jakarta nags to be "Gump ", rather than any individuals. -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For addition

Re: Gump nags, from address

Seems there is agreement, so I made the change below to the Jakarta descriptors. Should kick in for runs hereafter. -Rahul On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > Like Commons now does for the new gump builds, I suggest we change the > from address for all Jakarta nags

[RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Move ECS, ORO and Regexp to Attic

o the Attic was +0). Lets revisit Regexp in 6 months time if there isn't much activity. Thanks to everyone for their input. -Rahul On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > This is a vote (or more correctly, three independent votes) to move > Jakarta ECS, Jakarta ORO an

Re: [JMeter] Mime types on icons (was: svn commit: r991327)

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:04 PM, wrote: > Author: milamber > Date: Tue Aug 31 21:04:21 2010 > New Revision: 991327 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=991327&view=rev > Log: > Add missing files > Bug 30563 - Thread Group should have a start next loop option on Sample Error > > > Modified: >

Re: [JMeter] Mime types on icons (was: svn commit: r991327)

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:35 PM, sebb wrote: > On 31 August 2010 23:17, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:04 PM,   wrote: >>> Author: milamber >>> Date: Tue Aug 31 21:04:21 2010 >>> New Revision: 991327 >>> >>> URL: ht

Re: [JMeter] Mime types on icons (was: svn commit: r991327)

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Milamber wrote: > It's done in my ~/.subversion/config (read by SVNkit / Subversive plugin > on Eclipse). > I must recommit this images? > Nope, all good then (see previous reply). -Rahul - To

Re: [JMeter] Convert to Maven based build?

I've accepted the message below from the moderation queue, but please subscribe using your .ca address if you intend to keep posting to this list from it. -Rahul On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Peter Lynch wrote: > Hi sebb, > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:42 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 25 November

Re: [JMeter] Convert to Maven based build?

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote: > On Nov 25, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Peter Lin wrote: > >> even though I haven't been active in jmeter in a while, I am still a >> jmeter committer. >> > > Quantify "a while". > No need, we have archives for the curious. > I'm still a committee on

January board report input needed

Please provide any input for our January board report by Friday, January 14th by editing the wiki. I've added the template for January to the wiki here: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-January2011 -Rahul - To

Re: News link on Jakarta website

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:01 AM, sebb wrote: > On 11 January 2011 09:25, Milamber wrote: >> Hello, >> >> In Jakarta website, on right column at top, there is a http link to News >> with this url: >> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news/index.html >> >> But this page (news/index.html) has only ver

Re: January board report input needed

Last call :-) -Rahul On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > Please provide any input for our January board report by Friday, > January 14th by editing the wiki. I've added the template for January > to the wiki here: > >  http://wiki.apache.org/jakart

Site changes (was: svn commit: r1059706 - /jakarta/site/docs/site/news/index.html)

Best to commit related changes in the xdocs and docs directories together. So, the one below and r1059703 go together, as do r1059704 and r1059707. Also, for any changes to go live, an 'svn up' is needed in the people.apache.org:/www/jakarta.apache.org/ directory once the changes in docs/ are comm

Re: Site changes (was: svn commit: r1059706 - /jakarta/site/docs/site/news/index.html)

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Milamber wrote: >> Also, for any changes to go live, an 'svn up' is needed in the >> people.apache.org:/www/jakarta.apache.org/ directory once the changes >> in docs/ are committed. >> > > I do this yesterday ("svn update index.html site") but Jakarta site > keeps

Re: Site changes (was: svn commit: r1059706 - /jakarta/site/docs/site/news/index.html)

see: http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html While you are updating the "who we are" page, can you also remove the "Advisors" section? Thats a relic. Thanks. -Rahul > Le 17/01/2011 21:53, Rahul Akolkar a ecrit : >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Milamber wrote: &

[VOTE][LAZY] Move Jakarta Regexp to Attic

This is a vote to move Jakarta Regexp to the Apache Attic, based on the outcome of the most recent discussion on the topic. Since Regexp may not have enough PMC members active, this vote will be held by lazy consensus. If you object, please also provide a reasonable explanation. Vote runs for a w

April board report input needed

Please provide any input for our April board report by Friday, April 15th by editing the wiki. I've added the template for April to the wiki here: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-April2011 -Rahul - To unsubscr

[RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Move Jakarta Regexp to Attic

8:00 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > This is a vote to move Jakarta Regexp to the Apache Attic, based on > the outcome of the most recent discussion on the topic. > > Since Regexp may not have enough PMC members active, this vote will be > held by lazy consensus. If you object, p

Any Bugzilla admins here? (was: Bug report for Regexp [2011/05/08])

On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Dave Brosius wrote: > Given that regexp is attic-ized, should we stop this email, now? > Indeed, we need to stop the report and make Regexp readonly in Bugzilla. Any Bugzilla admins on this list? If not, we'll have to open an INFRA ticket. The overall ATTIC mov

Move BCEL and JCS to Commons?

This initial email is cross-posted, but lets keep the thread on dev@jakarta. Jakarta is no longer a sustainable home for Java libraries like BCEL and JCS. Commons, OTOH, is widely suited to such components and has a much more active community. Therefore, I want us to explore the possibility of mov

Re: Move BCEL and JCS to Commons?

One week later, we have 4 opinions in favor (and no other). I'll wait another week for comments before bringing this up on dev@commons. -Rahul On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > This initial email is cross-posted, but lets keep the thread on dev@jakarta. > >

Re: Move BCEL and JCS to Commons?

Related thread now initiated on dev@commons: http://commons.markmail.org/thread/akq47tuatib36yre -Rahul On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > One week later, we have 4 opinions in favor (and no other). I'll wait > another week for comments before bringing thi

[VOTE][LAZY] Move BCEL and JCS to Commons

After reasonable support to the idea on Jakarta and Commons lists, this is a vote to move BCEL and JCS to Apache Commons. As part of the move, I'll nominate any active committers for Commons karma (so far: dbrosius, asmuts, tv -- anyone else, please ping this thread). Since neither may have enoug

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move BCEL and JCS to Commons

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:09 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23 June 2011 03:38, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> After reasonable support to the idea on Jakarta and Commons lists, >> this is a vote to move BCEL and JCS to Apache Commons. >> >> As part of the move, I'll nominate a

[RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Move BCEL and JCS to Commons

38 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > After reasonable support to the idea on Jakarta and Commons lists, > this is a vote to move BCEL and JCS to Apache Commons. > > As part of the move, I'll nominate any active committers for Commons > karma (so far: dbrosius, asmuts, tv -- anyone else,

July board report input needed

Please provide any input for our July board report by Friday, July 15th by editing the wiki. I've added the template for July to the wiki here: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-July2011 -Rahul - To unsubscribe,

[NOTICE] BCEL and JCS SVN and site moves

Apache Commons have voted to accept BCEL and JCS. Accordingly, the SVN repositories and websites for the two projects will be moved shortly. I will reply this email when that is done. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jaka

Re: Activity of Jakarta subprojects

Forwarding below to dev@ and private@ for increased awareness. Replies to original thread on general@ please. -Rahul On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Thought I'd summarize the current activity of the subprojects: > > > * Cactus: No code commits since February 2009. Weak a

[PROPOSAL] JMeter TLP (was: Activity of Jakarta subprojects)

other probables). Comments? Lets say a week for comments before next step. -Rahul On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 20:50 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Rahul Akolkar >> wrote: >> > On S

JMeter TLP - draft resolution and first chair

I've created a draft TLP resolution for JMeter here, intent being to submit in time for the October board meeting: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/TLPJMeter Folks on initial PMC include those who voted on latest release (some arbitrary metric to get started) plus those involved in recent discuss

Re: JMeter TLP - draft resolution and first chair

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:31 PM, sebb wrote: > On 22 September 2011 01:15, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Henri Yandell >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Rahul Akolkar >>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Sep 2

[VOTE] Apache JMeter TLP

immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache JMeter Project: * Sebastian Bazley (sebb AT a.o) * Milamber (milamber AT a.o) * Peter Lin (woolfel AT a.o) * Henri Yandell (bayard AT a.o) * Rahul Akolkar (rahul AT a.o) * Oleg Kalnichevski (olegk AT a.

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache JMeter TLP

Vote passes with 17 +1s and 1 +0. I will include the TLP resolution for the board's consideration at next Wednesday's meeting. Thanks all, -Rahul On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > [This vote is being held on dev@jakarta, please reply there. This > message

October board report input needed

Please provide any input for our October board report by editing the wiki, I'll be sending the report Sunday. I've added the draft for October to the wiki here: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-October2011 -Rahul -

Re: [VOTE] Move Jakarta to the Attic; close down Jakarta PMC

cc+= {private, dev} for maximum coverage. +1 from me. -Rahul On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > A joint vote to retire Jakarta into the Attic and to ask the board to > close down the PMC. > >  [ ] +1 >  [ ] -1, because > > Hen >