Just a thought on ergonomics: it might be nice to separate clear and
delete, so instead of RDFConnection::delete either clearing or deleting a
graph depending on whether it is the default graph, you have finer control and
can clear a non-default graph.
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia
Thanks for the feedback Andy.
2/
Datasets that provide support for MW cases and don't provide transactions
seem rather unlikely so may be document what kind of DatasetGraph is being
supported by DatasetGraphWithRecord then just use the underlying lock..
Okay, that's certainly simpler! And
The main complicating factor is that clear and delete are only separate
operations if the storage layer stores graph names separately from graph
data which the SPARQL specification specifically do not require
For storage systems like TDB where only quads are stored the existence of
a named graph
Ah, that makes my distinction pretty meaningless! This abstraction seems meant
to rub out just such differences.
This does remind me of another potential nice small feature: a StreamTriple
construct(Query query) method, maybe at first via
QueryExecution::execConstructTriples. The
On 04/08/15 22:26, Stephen Allen wrote:
To my knowledge, the only argument for using GSP instead of just
query+update would be performance/scalability. Although, when I have
encountered those issues, I've attempted to fix the problem in query+update
instead (i.e. adding streaming support for
Eugene Tenkaev created JENA-1006:
Summary: How read and add triples to `Graph` at the same time?
Key: JENA-1006
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1006
Project: Apache Jena
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eugene Tenkaev updated JENA-1006:
-
Description:
Here is my code:
{code:java}
public class App {
public static void main(String[]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14658801#comment-14658801
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1006:
-
Iterators read from the database when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-1006:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
How read and add triples to `Graph` at the same time?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14658805#comment-14658805
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1006:
-
Questions usually go to us...@jena.apahe.org.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14658864#comment-14658864
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1006:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne closed JENA-1006.
---
How read and add triples to `Graph` at the same time?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-1006.
-
Resolution: Done
Fix Version/s: Jena 3.0.1
How read and add triples to `Graph` at the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14658912#comment-14658912
]
Eugene Tenkaev commented on JENA-1006:
--
Yes I read that, but how I can get from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14658912#comment-14658912
]
Eugene Tenkaev edited comment on JENA-1006 at 8/5/15 9:04 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eugene Tenkaev reopened JENA-1006:
--
How read and add triples to `Graph` at the same time?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14658912#comment-14658912
]
Eugene Tenkaev edited comment on JENA-1006 at 8/5/15 9:15 PM:
--
Hi,
I've fixed the bugs related to syntax checks. Please see my latest
commits. Here're the output of the syntax files through qparse (you
can also run ExampleConstructQuads.java to get the results). Are
these with the expected behaviors, especially for
syntax-quad-construct-07.arq?
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
On 04/08/15 22:26, Stephen Allen wrote:
To my knowledge, the only argument for using GSP instead of just
query+update would be performance/scalability. Although, when I have
encountered those issues, I've attempted to fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14659197#comment-14659197
]
Stephen Allen commented on JENA-999:
I'm having some difficulties, and maybe it is my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stephen Allen updated JENA-999:
---
Attachment: PerformanceTester.java
Poor jena-text query performance when a bound subject is used
21 matches
Mail list logo
