[jira] [Comment Edited] (JENA-1572) Setup LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect Jena's "release all" policy.

2019-04-07 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16811948#comment-16811948 ] Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-1572 at 4/7/19 7:20 PM: - The following

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1572) Setup LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect Jena's "release all" policy.

2019-04-07 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16811948#comment-16811948 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1572: - The following modules seem to have unnecessary LICENSE and

Re: Towards Jena 3.11.0

2019-04-07 Thread Andy Seaborne
Maven is something I can help with: I took a very quick, preliminary pass and produced: https://gist.github.com/afs/c6c291812bbc96fe55ac64ecdd1edfe4 That does not include every in the gradle file - I added artifact as needed to get "mvn clean verify -Drat.skip=true" to run, nothing more.

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-07 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-480602750 A link in LICENSE is better and acceptable these days. HdrHistogram and LatencyUtils binaries artifacts themselves don't include a LICENSE or

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Jena Report : April 2019

2019-04-07 Thread Marco Neumann
So using web.archive.org [1] I can track changes to the project name from "Jena" to "Jena Apache - TDB" in db rankings between the end of October 2018 and November 2018. Which is also, I presume, the string that is used to automate the methodology mentioned above. This also could explain the drop

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Jena Report : April 2019

2019-04-07 Thread Marco Neumann
:D certainly prejudice here, or it's a New York thing only. just to mention their methodology[1] to do the ranking here: * Number of mentions of the system on websites, measured as number of results in search engines queries. At the moment, we use Google, Bing and Yandex for this measurement. In

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Jena Report : April 2019

2019-04-07 Thread ajs6f
I don't really see in what sense Jena competes with Oracle or MySQL (top two listings) or for that matter, Google Cloud Spanner (?), ClickHouse (?), or Apache Drill. I'll admit, I'm a little annoyed by being outranked by something called "CockroachDB", but that's probably just a bit of

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Jena Report : April 2019

2019-04-07 Thread ajs6f
LGTM, two possible typos as shown below. ajs6f > On Apr 7, 2019, at 8:35 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > The project has continued to evolve the codebase. It is still in the process > of incorporating the significant contribution of a GeoSPARQL, mainly > restricted by PMC members bandwidth.

[DRAFT] Apache Jena Report : April 2019

2019-04-07 Thread Andy Seaborne
FYI: This month we got weevils and hedgehogs. The report generator puts in default text: ## Issues: - TODO - list any issues that require board attention, or say "there are no issues requiring board attention at this time" - if not, the weevils will get you. ## Health report: - TODO -