Re: Towards Jena 3.11.0

2019-04-17 Thread Aaron Coburn
Also +1 to releasing 3.11 soon and addressing these other issues in 3.12. (But either way is fine with me) Aaron On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 6:47 AM wrote: > +1 to releasing 3.11.0 as described and not loading it up any further. > > ajs6f > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019, 6:14 AM Andy Seaborne wrote: > >

Re: Sonar?

2019-04-17 Thread Aaron Coburn
It is possible to exclude specific modules from Sonar's analysis (I do this with some of my own projects). The documentation for this is here:

[GitHub] [jena] ajs6f commented on issue #534: Prometheus endpoint

2019-04-17 Thread GitBox
ajs6f commented on issue #534: Prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-484128825 @Claudenw It can be a little tricky, but you can send a PR to @seaninryan's PR. You would do that by pulling his branch into your local Github repo, and starting a new

[GitHub] [jena] Claudenw commented on issue #534: Prometheus endpoint

2019-04-17 Thread GitBox
Claudenw commented on issue #534: Prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-484127705 I hope to do that in the next few days / evenings On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 3:59 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > @Claudenw

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #534: Prometheus endpoint

2019-04-17 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #534: Prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-484127012 @Claudenw Would it be possible for you to work with Sean to get it in the PR? This is an automated message

[GitHub] [jena] Claudenw commented on issue #534: Prometheus endpoint

2019-04-17 Thread GitBox
Claudenw commented on issue #534: Prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-484040611 What is the process for me (3rd party) to add licenses to PR? On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 7:35 AM Claude Warren wrote: > > The two modules in question come

Re: Towards Jena 3.11.0

2019-04-17 Thread ajs6f
+1 to releasing 3.11.0 as described and not loading it up any further. ajs6f On Wed, Apr 17, 2019, 6:14 AM Andy Seaborne wrote: > We seem to be trying to do too much in one release. As ever, people get > busy. > > https://s.apache.org/jena-3.11.0-jira >36 JIRA > > including fixes like

Re: Towards Jena 3.11.0

2019-04-17 Thread Andy Seaborne
We seem to be trying to do too much in one release. As ever, people get busy. https://s.apache.org/jena-3.11.0-jira 36 JIRA including fixes like JENA-1657 "Close response stream of http connections". While not a major problem at the moment, it can start to cause blockage for other work.