[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17459488#comment-17459488
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-2215:
---
Commit a476
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17459486#comment-17459486
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-2215:
---
Commit 3669
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17459487#comment-17459487
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-2214:
---
Commit 1567
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-2215:
Summary: Make shared jar and war dependencies clearer (was: Make shared
jar dependencies clearer)
The more tests we have on different machines the better. :)
Personally I'd say if you have a choice go for a PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs and
stay away from SATA < III SSDs. Also for the tests SSD RAID isn't necessary.
These components have become extremely affordable in recent years and
really should be p
so I have solved the issue on my end by removing the exclusion in
the jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/pom.xml
org.apache.jena
jena-cmds
not sure what the motivation was here to add the exclusion, but jena-c
On 14/12/2021 10:38, Øyvind Gjesdal wrote:
Hi Marco,
Very useful to compare with your log on the different runs. Still working
with configuration to see if I can get the ingest data stage to be usable
for hdd. It looks like I get close to the performance of your run on the
earlier stages, whi
Hi Marco,
Very useful to compare with your log on the different runs. Still working
with configuration to see if I can get the ingest data stage to be usable
for hdd. It looks like I get close to the performance of your run on the
earlier stages, while ingest data is still very much too slow. Havi
Ok I will first investigate this a litte Andy. l think this might have
something to do with the logging change. The file size has obviously
changed from 39M in jena-fuseki-geosparql-4.3.0-SNAPSHOT.jar to 33M
in jena-fuseki-geosparql-4.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
Marco
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 1:14 PM Andy
Andy Seaborne created JENA-2215:
---
Summary: Make shared jar dependencies clearer
Key: JENA-2215
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2215
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: Task
Aff
There is a 2.16.0 release of log4j2.
Changes:
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/changes-report.html#a2.15.0
It removes the vulnerable functionality of message formatting and
defaults JNDI to disabled (for configuration files, not logging messages).
It is not a second security update.
http
Andy Seaborne created JENA-2214:
---
Summary: Update log4j2 to 2.16.0
Key: JENA-2214
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2214
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions
12 matches
Mail list logo
