[jira] [Updated] (JENA-650) Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Miguel Bento Alves updated JENA-650: Attachment: Files_created_changed.zip SparqlCommandsInRules.md

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-650) Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Miguel Bento Alves resolved JENA-650. - Resolution: Implemented > Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules > --

Re: GSoC - Jena 650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

Hi Andy, yes, my last update was 6 days ago following my mail from 16/07, where I inform that I finished the implementation in all engine modes. As I need to do a lot of tests, I use a local clone of Jena for developing. When I finish any step, I put in the repository the “clean” code (Cleaned

Re: GSoC - Jena 650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

So how's it going? I was asking because the repo does not seem to have changed in 6 days - ie. since before your email on 22/July Andy On 24/07/14 14:37, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: Hi Andy, yes, the repo is updated. Miguel On 24 Jul 2014, at 14:15, Andy Seaborne wrote: Miguel, I

Re: GSoC - Jena 650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

Hi Andy, yes, the repo is updated. Miguel On 24 Jul 2014, at 14:15, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Miguel, > > Is github.com/mbentoalves/jena up-to-date? > > Andy > > > On 22/07/14 12:45, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: >> Hi Andy, >> >> in a first glance, the problem stated in my email of 16/Ju

Re: GSoC - Jena 650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

Miguel, Is github.com/mbentoalves/jena up-to-date? Andy On 22/07/14 12:45, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: Hi Andy, in a first glance, the problem stated in my email of 16/July is a non-issue. However, I will see again. I have some doubts if a SPARQL command can produce new data that can

Re: GSoC - Jena 650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

Hi Andy, in a first glance, the problem stated in my email of 16/July is a non-issue. However, I will see again. I have some doubts if a SPARQL command can produce new data that can be false when new deductions are performed. I will deepen my study and, if necessary, prepare a show case. My

Re: GSoC - Jena 650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

On 19/07/14 00:10, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: Hi All, I did a new update in my repository (https://github.com/mbentoalves/jena). I implemented Sparql commands in rules in hybrid and forward mode. Now, we can define sparql commands in rules in all engine modes (backward, forwardRETE, hybrid, fo

GSoC - Jena 650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

Hi All, I did a new update in my repository (https://github.com/mbentoalves/jena). I implemented Sparql commands in rules in hybrid and forward mode. Now, we can define sparql commands in rules in all engine modes (backward, forwardRETE, hybrid, forward). Rules with a sparql command only can h

GSoC - Jena 650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

Hi All, I updated again in my repository (https://github.com/mbentoalves/jena). In this version, I implemented Sparql commands in rules in forwardRETE mode. Now, I will work in the others modes (hybrid and forward). Only after that I will try to hook sparql commands with rules terms in a rule.

GSoC - Jena 650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

Hi All, I updated my repository (https://github.com/mbentoalves/jena). I implemented Sparql commands in rules in backward mode. For now, rules with a sparql command only can have 1 body term, the sparql command himself. My next step will be do the same for the forward mode. After that, I will

Re: JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules (syntax)

Miguel, You can create Query object, set some prefixes and then pass this to the parser QueryFactory.parse(Query, ) any PREFIX in the SPARQL query will simple reset the prefix setting. It's just like PREFIX ex: PREFIX ex: the second prefix decl w

Re: JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules (syntax)

; I think that is the better choice because whatever the token we choose >>>we >>> will have the same problems. Furthermore, is congruent with rules >>>syntax. >>> >>> I don't have much experience in team development. How is the better way >>&g

Re: JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules (syntax)

in team development. How is the better way >>to >> share code with you? > >Please set up a repository e.g. on github. > > Andy > >> >> Miguel >> >> >> >> On 04/06/14 08:56, "Andy Seaborne" wrote: >> >>

Re: JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules (syntax)

ent. How is the better way to share code with you? Please set up a repository e.g. on github. Andy Miguel On 04/06/14 08:56, "Andy Seaborne" wrote: On 03/06/14 17:15, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: Hi all, I'm working on JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules,

Re: JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules (syntax)

rules syntax. I don't have much experience in team development. How is the better way to share code with you? Miguel On 04/06/14 08:56, "Andy Seaborne" wrote: >On 03/06/14 17:15, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm working on JENA-650 - Defi

Re: JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules (syntax)

On 03/06/14 17:15, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: Hi all, I'm working on JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules, under GSoC project. Right now, I need to define the syntax to declare a SPARQL command in a rule. My proposal is to do as in rules, enclosed between parenthesis (some exa

JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules (syntax)

Hi all, I'm working on JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules, under GSoC project. Right now, I need to define the syntax to declare a SPARQL command in a rule. My proposal is to do as in rules, enclosed between parenthesis (some examples listed below). I need some feedback fro

Re: JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

On 25/05/14 14:51, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: Dear All, I'm working on JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules under GSoC project. I'm starting to study and analyse the relevant libraries and the coding relevants to my work. Can anyone locate for me the libraries/classes w

Re: JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

ly this will get you started… [1] http://jena.apache.org/documentation/inference/ On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: Dear All, I'm working on JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules under GSoC project. I'm starting to study and analyse the relevant librarie

Re: JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

goto source". In some aspects, things get a little more complicated with Interface and InterfaceImpl hierarchies, but generally this will get you started… [1] http://jena.apache.org/documentation/inference/ On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: > Dear All, > >

JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

Dear All, I'm working on JENA-650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules under GSoC project. I'm starting to study and analyse the relevant libraries and the coding relevants to my work. Can anyone locate for me the libraries/classes where: a) a rule is parsed; b) a rule is exec

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-650) Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13925337#comment-13925337 ] Cong Wang commented on JENA-650: I remember there's a paper by Axel Polleres. It's about tra

[jira] [Created] (JENA-650) Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

Miguel Bento Alves created JENA-650: --- Summary: Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules Key: JENA-650 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-650 Project: Apache Jena Issue Type: New Fe