We haven't heard anything more so far - just the one response that
amounts to "thank you for nudging us to move away from our use of OSGi".
I'll merge the retirement PR.
Andy
On 20/09/2021 11:42, Andy Seaborne wrote:
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2165
On 19/09/2021 11
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2165
On 19/09/2021 11:12, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Good answer!
I'll send a message to users@. We'll also get a signal from the lack of
bundle in 4.2.0.
The other case is systems who are further behind on version. Probably
they are less affected
Good answer!
I'll send a message to users@. We'll also get a signal from the lack of
bundle in 4.2.0.
The other case is systems who are further behind on version. Probably
they are less affected if we retire apache-jena-osgi because they can
wait until the next release (if they help with get
That particular SO issue comes from the use of Jena in the Islandora
project. I reached out to some developers I know in that community to ask
about their plans for using Jena in an OSGi context. Apparently, they are
moving away from OSGi, likely in the direction of runnable jars. In fact,
the reac
In the 4.2.0 release, the OSGi artifacts were pulled from the
convenience binaries because they didn't work properly.
Only Aaron's diligent testing caught this.
The new problem is with the new dependency - Titanium JSON-LD not being
OSGi compatible. There is a quick fix in the code making Tita
