Re: Towards Jena 3.7.0

2018-03-28 Thread Andy Seaborne
Hi Osma, Thanks for letting me know. It's always hard to find the time. What we could do is release 3.7.0, and then an earlier than normal 3.8.0 because Bruno's work on plain, regular JSON output as a SPARQL extension is nearly ready as well (until he went to look at the cherry blossom in

Re: Towards Jena 3.7.0

2018-03-28 Thread Osma Suominen
Sorry, I meant of course that JENA-1488 wouldn't be ready. JENA-1506 is done, documentation and all, thanks to Chris! -Osma Osma Suominen kirjoitti 28.03.2018 klo 10:39: Hi Andy! I just did a couple of small fixes to the fuseki systemd service file (JENA-1510 and JENA-1511). But it turns

Re: Towards Jena 3.7.0

2018-03-28 Thread Osma Suominen
Hi Andy! I just did a couple of small fixes to the fuseki systemd service file (JENA-1510 and JENA-1511). But it turns out JENA-1506 won't be ready soon enough, so from my perspective you can go ahead with the release. Sorry for the delay. -Osma Andy Seaborne kirjoitti 22.03.2018 klo

Re: Towards Jena 3.7.0

2018-03-22 Thread Andy Seaborne
A few days is fine For timing the VOTE, I have recently tried to leave at least a couple of the days which are in the week and not a weekend anyway. And I have documentation updates to do. Presumably there are some for 1506/1488? Andy On 22/03/18 12:09, Osma Suominen wrote: Hi Andy,

Re: Towards Jena 3.7.0

2018-03-22 Thread Osma Suominen
Hi Andy, JENA-1488 was waiting for JENA-1506 to be merged. Now that's done it should be pretty much ready for merging too. I'd prefer to see it in the 3.7.0 release, if it's not too much trouble to wait a few more days. -Osma Andy Seaborne kirjoitti 22.03.2018 klo 12:34: Hi all, I've

Re: Towards Jena 3.7.0

2018-03-22 Thread Andy Seaborne
Hi all, I've successfully dry-run the build from what is in master at the moment JENA-1506: The PR looks to be merged - can the JIRA ticket be resolved? JENA-632: we've run out of time on this and although it is quite close to being ready, it's not quite there yet (a bit too easy to trip over

Re: Towards Jena 3.7.0

2018-03-09 Thread ajs6f
> On Mar 9, 2018, at 10:23 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > Status?: > * PR#368 "Return Model from PrefixMapping methods" JENA-1495 Just merged, I will close the ticket. > * JENA-1499 : PR done, JIRA open - is there work still in progress? My mistake-- I just closed the ticket.

Towards Jena 3.7.0

2018-03-09 Thread Andy Seaborne
How are we looking for Jena 3.7.0? I can RM. Don't let me stop anyone else but changes in Fuseki for custom services will help me so this is $job time. I suggest we email users@ to say we are hoping to release in the coming weeks (no specific date), and say "please test (=> "this is your