Github user codecov-io commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/327
# [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/jmeter/pull/327?src=pr&el=h1)
Report
> Merging
[#327](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/jmeter/pull/327?src=pr&el=desc) into
[trunk](https://codecov.io/gh/
GitHub user ham1 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/328
Improve wording and formatting of jmeter.properties
- fixed some typos,
- re-formatted some lines to aid readability and
- removed extra whitespace.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
GitHub user ham1 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/327
Utilising more modern Java, simplifying code and formatting code and
comments
## Description
Three commits covering three types of change:
- Formatting and comment tidy up
- Use modern Java
I use the workbench for recording.
I propose to add recording information to documentation about workbench.
I propose to rename workbench to "temporary elements"
-0
El 12 nov. 2017 1:33 p. m., "Felix Schumacher" <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> escribió:
Am 10. November 2017 16:07:39 MEZ s
On 10/11/2017 15:07, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
If we look at consensus, we have:
- 3 (+1) to remove it (Maxime, Antonio and me) with favor to move the
elements inside Test plan as disabled (so backward compat). If we have a PR
or patch that does that, I'll merge it after testing as m
Am 10. November 2017 16:07:39 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad
:
>If we look at consensus, we have:
>
> - 3 (+1) to remove it (Maxime, Antonio and me) with favor to move the
>elements inside Test plan as disabled (so backward compat). If we have
>a PR
>or patch that does that, I'll merge it after t
