Re: [jruby-dev] Pre-branch (1.7) reorg of codebase

2013-06-28 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
Tom: Maybe you can do some verification that mvn package ; ant dist produces the right artifacts? I think our best path forward would be to switch over to mvn as soon as possible and slowly start dropping ant stuff as we confirm it's working. But getting it in place and using it day today sooner

Re: [jruby-dev] Pre-branch (1.7) reorg of codebase

2013-06-28 Thread Thomas E Enebo
Charlie and I just talked about this and Charlie will merge this work onto master and we will debug and fix from there. My only other issue which might have been covered earlier is how we deal with snapshots? We frequently update a library in build_lib today with the intention to release it

Re: [jruby-dev] Pre-branch (1.7) reorg of codebase

2013-06-28 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Thomas E Enebo tom.en...@gmail.com wrote: Charlie and I just talked about this and Charlie will merge this work onto master and we will debug and fix from there. This is done! I made one additional change to use the shade plugin to produce lib/jruby.jar directly

Re: [jruby-dev] Pre-branch (1.7) reorg of codebase

2013-06-28 Thread kristian
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Thomas E Enebo tom.en...@gmail.com wrote: We frequently update a library in build_lib today with the intention to release it before our next jruby release. @Tom I am sure you know this: the usual maven procedure is using snapshots - assuming that all of you

Re: [jruby-dev] Pre-branch (1.7) reorg of codebase

2013-06-28 Thread kristian
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.comwrote: Can we make pom-ng.xml be pom.xml right now, kristian? yes, go ahead. then I will rebase my repo to jruby master and send pull requests. I have to admit that I did switch over to use Mavenfile to do my changes.

Re: [jruby-dev] Pre-branch (1.7) reorg of codebase

2013-06-28 Thread Thomas E Enebo
yeah I was just not aware that sonatype gives us easy access to snapshots repo. Knowing this makes me feel better about doing it the maven way. -Tom On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:35 PM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote: On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Thomas E Enebo tom.en...@gmail.comwrote:

Re: [jruby-dev] Pre-branch (1.7) reorg of codebase

2013-06-28 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
Oh and it looks like our next goal might be getting snapshot repo set up, since travis can't find jnr-posix 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT to build. It will be red until we can get a snapshot repo set up. - Charlie On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com wrote: Ok, updates...

Re: [jruby-dev] Pre-branch (1.7) reorg of codebase

2013-06-28 Thread kristian
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.comwrote: * building openssl and readline into their own jars (in stdlib), as in ant build. They're done this way so we can upgrade them. Will it be easier to do this if we make them their own artifacts? See jar-jopenssl

Re: [jruby-dev] Pre-branch (1.7) reorg of codebase

2013-06-28 Thread Wayne Meissner
I just pushed a jnr-posix snapshot, and its in the sonatype snapshots dir. Not sure if/when those get propagated to maven central. On 29 June 2013 06:06, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com wrote: Oh and it looks like our next goal might be getting snapshot repo set up, since travis

Re: [jruby-dev] Pre-branch (1.7) reorg of codebase

2013-06-28 Thread Douglas Campos
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 10:21:57AM +1000, Wayne Meissner wrote: I just pushed a jnr-posix snapshot, and its in the sonatype snapshots dir. Not sure if/when those get propagated to maven central. This happens because our parent isn't sonatype atm; we might want to go the consistency way and move